Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-8941Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · LOW PROFILE LAPIDUS PLATE, TITANIUM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867051706), received between Jul 14, 2017 and Jun 12, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Detachment Of Device Component1

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 12, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA A MEDWATCH REPORT THAT THE PATIENT HAD A MIDFOOT FUSION BY A DIFFERENT SURGEON BETWEEN 8-12 MONTHS AGO. THE FUSION SITE DID NOT FUSE DUE TO BROKEN HARDWARE (AR-8941), CAUSING TOO MUCH MOTION.

    Patient problems: Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture

    MAUDE report 19525334 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 7, 2019Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DRIVER TIP BROKE OFF IN THE SCREW DURING REMOVAL OF A LAPIDUS PLATE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED (B)(6) 2019: THE PATIENT¿S ORIGINAL IMPLANT CASE WAS A LAPIDUS PROCEDURE. THE EXPLANT PROCEDURE, WHICH WAS A REMOVAL OF A LAPIDUS PLATE AND SCREWS, TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2019. DEVICES WERE BEING EXPLANTED DUE TO PATIENT PAIN. DATE OF ORIGINAL LAPIDUS SURGERY HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED AT THIS TIME. THE FOLLOWING DEVICES WERE EXPLANTED DURING THE (B)(6) 2019 PROCEDURE: AR-8941 LAPIDUS PLATE (QTY 1); AR-8935L-14 LOCKING SCREW, (QTY 1); AR-8935L-16 LOCKING SCREW (QTY 2); AND AR-8935-16 CORTICAL SCREW (QTY1). AFTER THE DRIVER TIP BROKE THE SURGEON CHOSE TO NOT EXPLANT THE 4.0 HEADLESS SCREW AND IT REMAINS IN THE PATIENT¿S BODY. NO FRAGMENTS OF THE BROKEN DRIVER WERE LEFT IN THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 8317033 ↗
  • InjuryJul 14, 2017Break; Detachment Of Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A LAPIDUS BUNIONECTOMY ON (B)(6) 2015 (B)(6) MEDICAL CENTER IN WHICH A PLATE AND 5 SCREWS WERE IMPLANTED IN HER LEFT FOOT. THE PATIENT BEGAN TO EXPERIENCE FOOT PAIN BEGINNING IN THE INCISION AREA AND RADIATING OUTWARD IN (B)(6) 2017. THE PATIENT IS SCHEDULED TO HAVE THE PLATE AND 5 SCREWS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2017 AS THE BONE HAS FUSED . FOLLOW INVESTIGATION: SURGEON PERFORMED A SECOND SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017 WHERE HE EXPLANTED THE FOLLOWING DEVICES WHICH HAD BEEN IMPLANTED DURING THE (B)(6) 2015 PROCEDURE: AR-8952TT-03 QTY 1, AR-8933L-14 QTY 2, AR-8933L-12 QTY 2, AR-8933L-24 QTY 1. THE PATIENT ALSO HAD AN AR-8730-34H FULLY THREADED MINI COMPRESSION SCREW FROM THE ORIGINAL PROCEDURE THAT THE SURGEON CHOSE TO LEAVE IN THE PATIENT. DURING THE (B)(6) 2017 SURGERY, THE SURGEON WAS USING A HEXALOBE DRIVER TO REMOVE THE SCREWS AND THE TIP OF THE DRIVER BROKE OFF. THE TIP WAS RETRIEVED WITH FORCEPS AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Pain

    MAUDE report 6714787 ↗

Other PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices

All PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page