Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-9211Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · GLENOID RMR SFT W/GLOVE PROTECTOR · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867058965), received between May 10, 2024 and May 24, 2024 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 4 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 24, 2024Break; Break

    ON 10/21/2021, IT WAS REPORTED BY A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE VIA (B)(4) THAT AN AR-9211 SHAFT APPEARS TO BE WARPED AND IS NOT DRILLING OR REMAINING IN A TIGHT DRILL PATTERN. THIS OCCURRED DURING A TOTAL SHOULD PROCEDURE, THE BIT THAT QUICK CONNECTS ONTO THE OF THE END OF THIS SHAFT IS VERY WOBBLY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT EFFECT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19392529 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 21, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED ON 10/24/2022 BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA SEMS THAT AN AR-9233, AR-9211 AND AR-9239 DEVICES WERE DAMAGED DURING USE. DURING CASE THE STRAIGHT SHAFT REAMER IS BENT WHICH CAUSED AN ISSUE WHEN DRILLING WITH 4.5 DRILL BIT.4.5 DRILL BIT WAS EXTREMELY DULL. IMPACTOR BROKE WHILE IMPACTING FOR VAULTLOCK. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A CASE AND BROKE INSIDE THE JOINT SPACE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19359140 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 21, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING A TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY THE 6MM DRILL BIT WOULD NOT ATTACH PROPERLY TO THE SHAFT AND THE DEVICE IS STICKING. IT FINALLY ENGAGED AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER ISSUES AND THE PATIENT IS FINE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19358347 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 10, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ECLIPSE VAULTLOCK SURGERY IT WAS FOUND THAT THE ATTACHMENT OF THE SHAFT WAS TWISTED AND IT DID NOT FIT INTO THE REAMER ATTACHMENT. THEREFORE THE SURGEON HAD TO USE THE JACOB'S CHUCK TO FINISH THE SURGERY SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY REPORTED. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19285127 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page