Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-13110R-02Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · CONTURLK FEM OS-TEOTOMY PLT RGHT L/XL · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00888867088306), received between Jan 13, 2025 and Jan 13, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 13, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA (B)(4) THAT AN AR-13110R-02 CONTOURLOCK FEMORAL OSTEOTOMY PLATE HAD AN ISSUE DURING A DISTAL FEMORAL OSTEOTOMY (DFO) PROCEDURE. THE FIRST 6.5 CANCELLOUS SCREW WAS INSERTED INTO THE DISTAL CONDYLE. THEN, THE FIRST 4.5MM CORTICAL SCREW WAS PLACED INTO THE FIRST SHAFT HOLE PROXIMAL TO THE MOST DISTAL SHAFT HOLE. TWO ADDITIONAL 6.5MM CANCELLOUS SCREWS WERE PLACED IN THE DISTAL CONDYLE SCREW HOLES, LEAVING THE LOCKING HOLE UNOCCUPIED. A SECOND 4.5MM CORTICAL SCREW WAS INSERTED INTO THE SHAFT HOLE PROXIMAL TO THE PREVIOUSLY PLACED CORTICAL SCREW. THE SCREW INITIALLY ADVANCED SMOOTHLY BY HAND, BUT AS IT ENGAGED THE BUSHING, AN AUDIBLE CRACK WAS HEARD. X-RAY IMAGING REVEALED NO VISIBLE FRACTURE AT THAT TIME. THE NEXT PROXIMAL SHAFT HOLE WAS DRILLED USING THE SAME TECHNIQUE (CIRCUMFERENTIALLY OPENING THE NEAR CORTEX), AND A SECOND CRACK WAS HEARD DURING SCREW INSERTION. X-RAY IMAGING REVEALED A SPLIT IN THE FEMUR EXTENDING PROXIMALLY TOWARD THE HIP. THE MOST DISTAL SCREW HOLE IN THE SHAFT OF THE PLATE WAS THEN FILLED WITHOUT INCIDENT OR AUDIBLE CRACKING. A FINAL SCREW WAS PLACED IN THE MOST PROXIMAL HOLE OF THE PLATE. WHILE NO CR

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 21143836 ↗

Other PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices

All PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page