Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-8730-32HRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · COMPR FT SCRW,3.5 MINI,32MM LGTH · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867127050), received between Feb 19, 2019 and Jan 12, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 12, 2024Break; Break

    ON 12/14/2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A DISTRIBUTOR THAT AN AR-8730-32H MINI COMPRESSION FT SCREW BROKE. THIS OCCURRED DURING A NAVICULAR FRACTURE ON (B)(6) 2023, WHERE THE NAVICULAR WAS PROPERLY REDUCED AND DRILLED. UPON INSERTING THE SCREW, THE FIRST SCREWDRIVER USED WAS STRIPPED. A SECOND DRIVER WAS USED BUT BEGAN STRIPPING AS WELL. THE EXTRACTOR/TREPHINE FROM THE AR-8738C SET WAS USED TO TRY AND REMOVE THE SCREW, BUT THE SCREW BROKE. THE PORTION OF THE BROKEN SCREW AND K-WIRE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT AS PART OF THE FINAL CONSTRUCT. A DYNANITE STAPLE WAS USED AS WELL TO PROVIDE FURTHER COMPRESSION. THE DOCTOR NOTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD VERY HARD BONE QUALITY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 18505873 ↗
  • InjuryAug 18, 2023Break; Break

    ON (B)(6) 2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA SEMS THAT AN AR-8950SD-10 T10 HEXALOBE SHAFT HAD AN ISSUE. DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, WHEN TRYING TO REMOVE A 3.5 HEADLESS COMPRESSION FT SCREW, PART OF THE TIP BROKE OFF IN THE SCREW. THEY WERE ABLE TO USE A DENTAL PICK AND GET THE PIECE OUT AND USED ANOTHER DRIVER HANDLE. PART OF THE SCREW ENDED UP BREAKING AS WELL BUT LEFT HALF OF THE SCREW IN. THIS OCCURRED DURING USE WITH NO PATIENT HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED. ON 8/1/2023, THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE STATED THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OVER THE PHONE: THIS OCCURRED DURING A REVISION SURGERY. THE INITIAL MIDFOOT FUSION SURGERY WITH UNKNOWN ARTHREX PARTS TOOK PLACE WITHIN THE LAST YEAR AND WAS SUCCESSFUL, BUT THE PATIENT AFTERWARD STILL EXPERIENCED PAIN. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON REMOVED A COMPRESSION DYNANITE PLATE AND TRIED TO REMOVE TWO AR-8730-32H MINI COMPRESSION FT SCREWS. WHEN TRYING TO REMOVE THE FIRST SCREW, THE TIP OF THE HEXALOBE SHAFT BROKE OFF IN THE SCREW, BUT THEY WERE ABLE TO REMOVE THAT FRAGMENT FROM THE SCREW BY USING A DENTAL PICK. WHEN A DRIVER HANDLE WAS USED TO REMOVE THAT FIRST SCREW AFTERWARD, ABOUT 1

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 17572069 ↗
  • InjuryOct 5, 2020Break

    IT WAS REPORTED, THAT DURING AN ANKLE FRACTURE REPAIR, THE SURGEON PREPPED THE BONE USING THE 2.7 DRILL, WITH K-WIRE AND PROFILE DRILL. WHEN INSERTING THE FIRST AR-8730-32H, COMPRESSION SCREW ON POWER, THE DRIVER TORQUED. THE SURGEON CONTINUED BY USING A HAND DRIVER TO ADVANCE THE SCREW BEFORE IT SNAPPED ABOUT 2/3 THE WAY IN. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO REMOVE THE SCREW USING VICE GRIPS. THE SURGEON CLEANED THE INSERTION SITE USING A 2.7 DRILL BIT AND PROFILE DRILL A SECOND TIME TO CREATE A CLEANER DRILL HOLE AND REMOVE ANY BONE DEBRIS. THE SURGEON THEN ATTEMPTED TO INSERT A SECOND AR-8730-32H COMPRESSION SCREW WITH THE HAND DRIVER AND THE SCREW SNAPPED OFF IN THE SAME LOCATION. THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO RETRIEVE THE BROKEN PART OF THE SCREW. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE REDUCTION OF THE FRACTURE NOT AS EXPECTED. THE ISSUES EXTENDED THE PROCEDURE BY ONE HOUR.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10631200 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 19, 2019Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A 1ST MTP JOINT FUSION, THE SURGEON PERFORMED PER THE USUAL TECHNIQUE. THE BONE WAS PREPPED BY DRILLING WITH K-WIRE AND OVER-DRILL. THE K-WIRE AND DRILL WERE PART OF THE REQUIRED SET. WHILE INSERTING THE COMPRESSION SCREW, THE SCREW SHAFT SNAPPED LEAVING 2/3 OF THE SCREW IN THE BONE. THE HEAD PORTION OF THE SCREW WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED BY INSERTING A SECOND SCREW IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO ACHIEVE JOINT COMPRESSION PRIOR TO PLATING.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 8349714 ↗

Other Plate, fixation, bone devices

All Plate, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page