Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-8740-50HRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · COMPR FT SCRW,4.0 STD,50MM LGTH · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867127937), received between Feb 9, 2021 and Apr 15, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 15, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ON 3/20/2024, AN INQUIRY WAS SUBMITTED BY A NURSE CASE MANAGER VIA PHONE FOR A PATCH TEST KIT ON BEHALF OF A PATIENT AND SURGEON. THE PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING SEVERE ITCHING ON BOTH ANKLES AND FEMUR WHERE THE AR-8740-40H STANDARD COMPRESSION FT, TITANIUM, 4 MM X 40 MM, AR-8740-48H STANDARD COMPRESSION FT, TITANIUM, 4 MM X 48 MM, AND AR-8740-50H STANDARD COMPRESSION FT, TITANIUM, 4 MM X 50 MM WAS IMPLANTED. THEY WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THESE SCREWS ARE THE CAUSE OF THE SENSITIVITY THE PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING. IF PROVEN, THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL SURGERY TO REMOVE THE SCREWS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 3/22/2024: MATERIAL COMPOSITION WAS REQUESTED BY THE NURSE CASE MANAGER ON AR-8740-40H STANDARD COMPRESSION FT, TITANIUM, 4 MM X 40 MM, AR-8740-48H STANDARD COMPRESSION FT, TITANIUM, 4 MM X 48 MM, AND AR-8740-50H STANDARD COMPRESSION FT, TITANIUM, 4 MM X 50 MM THAT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT DURING A ORIF OF LEFT AND RIGHT TALUS AS WELL AS ARTHROSCOPY WITH FOREIGN BODY REMOVAL OF LEFT AND RIGHT ANKLE ON (B)(6) 2021. S CREWS WERE USED BILATERALLY. THE SYMPTOMS OF SEVERE ITCHING AND SKIN IRRITATION HAVE BEEN OCCURRING SINCE SHORTLY AFTER THIS TIME AND THE PATIENT HAS BEEN TR

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction

    MAUDE report 19107099 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 24, 2023Break; Break

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 10/17/2023: THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER AR-8740-50H STANDARD COMPRESSION FT. THE CASE WAS NOT DELAYED, AND ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS UNNECESSARY. THE PATIENT SUFFERED NO NEGATIVE EFFECTS.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17994833 ↗
  • InjuryNov 8, 2021Break

    ON 10/19/2021, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-8740-50H SCREW BROKE DURING INSERTION OF THE MEDIAL MALLEOLUS. THIS OCCURRED DURING A ARTHROSCOPIC MEDIAL MALLEOLUS ORIF ON (B)(6) 2021 PROPER PREPARATION OF THE BONE SOCKET WAS DONE AS OBSERVED, THE FIRST HALF WAS INSERTED WITH POWER SUBSEQUENTLY THEN SWITCHED TO HAND, THE SCREW BROKE AFTER A FEW TURNS BY HAND. THE BROKEN POINT WAS AT THE CONJUNCTION OF THE CORTICAL AND CANCELLOUS THREAD. THE SCREW WAS REMOVED USING PLIERS, AND THE INCISION WAS EXTENDED IN ORDER TO ACCESS THE BROKEN PART OF THE SCREW. A DOWNSIZED SCREW WAS USED AFTER TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THE SURGERY WAS DELAYED TO THIS INCIDENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED ON 10/20/2021 THERE¿S NO LOT NUMBER ON THE SCREW AS IT WASN¿T A SINGLE PACKED PRODUCT. THUS I COULDN¿T PROVIDE THE LOT NUMBER. A 1.1MM GUIDEWIRE AND 3.2MM CANNULATED DRILL BIT WAS USED TO PREPARE BONE SOCKET. BONE SHOULD BE HARD AS PATIENT IS YOUNG. OPERATION WAS DELAYED FOR ABOUT 30MINS. ADDITIONAL ANAESTHETIC WAS REQUIRED. A 4X40MM SCREW WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE OPERATION AFTER THE BROKEN SCREW BEEN REMOVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12770320 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2021Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MEDIAL MALLEOLUS OSTEOTOMY AND FIXATION PROCEDURE, THE COMPRESSION FT SCREW, AR-8740-50H, BROKE WHILE BEING INSERTED INTO THE HOLE DRILLED USING A PROFILE DRILL AND LONG DRILL. THE BROKEN PART WAS AT THE CONJUNCTION OF THE CORTICAL AND CANCELLOUS THREAD. THE SCREW BROKE WHEN ONLY 1CM WAS INSERTED. THE BROKEN FRAGMENTS WERE REMOVED AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH AN AR-8740-48H WITH NO ADVERSE EFFECT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11301226 ↗

Other Screw, fixation, bone devices

All Screw, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page