Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-2922BCRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · SUTR ANCH, BIO-COMP P-LCK, 2.4 X 11.3 · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867197664), received between Sep 6, 2017 and Apr 19, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Component Missing1
  • Entrapment of Device1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Code Available1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 19, 2024Break; Break

    ON 06/28/2022, IT WAS REPORTED BY A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE VIA SEMS THAT AN AR-2922BC BIOCOMPOSITE PUSHLOCK IS BROKEN. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN UNSPECIFIED TIME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19147127 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 19, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ON 9/26/2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AR-2922BC BIOCOMPOSITE PUSHLOCK AND AN AR-1923BC BIOCOMPOSITE PUSHLOCK ANCHORS PULLED OUT. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17966823 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 18, 2022Break

    ON 12/27/2021, IT WAS REPORTED BY A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-2922BC BIOCOMPOSITE-CORKSCREW BROKE OFF UPON INSERTION. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN ARTHROSCOPIC PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. SURGEON COULD NOT LOCATE THE BROKEN ANCHOR INSIDE THE PATIENT, OUTSIDE IN THE OR FIELD AND COULD NOT DETECT THE ANCHOR VIA X-RAY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 13281741 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2021Break; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LABRAL REPAIR, SIX AR-2922BCS WERE USED. ONE IMPLANTED FINE, THE OTHER 5 BROKE DURING INSERTION. IN ALL 5 ATTEMPTS, THE EYELET AND AN ANCHOR FRAGMENT REMAINS IN THE PATIENT. PATIENT IS 16 YEAR OLD FEMALE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 11475192 ↗
  • InjuryNov 6, 2019Component Missing; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS DISCOVERED VIA FACILITY MEDWATCH REPORT ((B)(4)) THAT THE FOLLOWING INCIDENT OCCURRED: WHILE ATTEMPTING TO INSERT THE ANCHOR FOR THE LABRAL REPAIR IT DISLODGED UPON INSERTION AND COULD NOT BE FOUND VISUALLY WITH THE ARTHROSCOPE. ANOTHER ANCHOR WAS OPEN AND UTILIZED CORRECTLY TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE INITIAL ANCHOR THAT WAS DISLODGED WAS NOT FOUND AND REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. ARTHREX ANCHOR WAS A BIO-COMPOSITE PUSHLOCK 2.4 X 11.3MM (EXPIRATION DATE 04/30/2021, REFERENCE NUMBER AR-2922BC. SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS, DRESSINGS APPLIED AND PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO PACU. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE FACILITY CLINICAL RISK SPECIALIST: THE DATE OF THE PROCEDURE WAS (B)(6) 2019. IT IS POSSIBLE THE DEVICE MAY HAVE BEEN SUCTIONED OUT BY THE NEPTUNE DEVICE HOWEVER THEY WERE UNABLE TO CONFIRM THIS. THE DEVICE COULD STILL BE IN THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9287380 ↗
  • InjurySep 6, 2017Break

    IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REP THAT DURING A LABRAL REPAIR PROCEDURE, THE 2.4 BIO-COMPOSITE PUSHLOCK WAS INSERTED AND WHILE MALLETTING, THE ANCHOR BROKE. A SECOND ANCHOR WAS OPENED AND AGAIN, THE BIO-COMPOSITE PUSHLOCK BROKE ON INSERTION. THIS HAPPENED THREE MORE TIMES FOR A TOTAL OF 5 DEVICES ALL WITH THE SAME LOT NUMBER (LOT: 10143236). ALL BROKEN PIECES WERE RETRIEVED AND THE ADEQUATE FIXATION WAS FINALLY OBTAINED WITH THE 5 ANCHORS IMPLANTED. FOLLOW UP INVESTIGATION: ALL PIECES OF THE BROKEN IMPLANTS WERE RETRIEVED WITH GRASPERS AND A SHAVER. THE 5 PARTIAL IMPLANTS (OF THE SAME LOT NUMBER) REMAINED IN PATIENT WITH ADEQUATE FIXATION.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 6845921 ↗

Other Fastener, fixation, biodegradable, soft tissue devices

All Fastener, fixation, biodegradable, soft tissue devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page