Arthrex® AR-13226TSRecalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · BB-TAK, THREADED, STRL · Class 1 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867198609), received between Feb 14, 2022 and Jan 20, 2026 — classified as 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (8 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break8
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Insufficient Information2
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 20, 2026Break
ON 05-JAN-2026, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX SUBSIDIARY EMPLOYEE VIA (B)(4) THAT AN AR-13226TS BB-TAK TIP BROKE WHILE FIXING THE PLATE. THE BROKEN TIP COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED. THIS OCCURRED DURING USE IN A ORIF CASE WITH NO PATIENT EFFECT. NO DELAY IN CASE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 24114821 ↗MalfunctionNov 5, 2025Break; Break
ON 10/23/2025, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX SUBSIDIARY EMPLOYEE VIA (B)(4) THAT AN AR-13226TS THREADED BBTAK WAS USED TO TEMPORARILY FIXATE THE PLATE IN DISTAL FIBULA FRACTURE REPAIR. WHEN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE IT, THE SURGEON NOTICED THAT THE THREADS HAD BROKEN AND THAT A FRAGMENT HAD REMAINED INSIDE THE BODY. THIS OCCURRED DURING USE IN A CASE. AS REMOVAL WOULD BE DIFFICULT, THE FRAGMENT WAS LEFT IN PLACE AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED. NO ADDITIONAL PRODUCTS WERE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. THE PLATE USED WAS AR-9963APLL-06S (LOT NUMBER UNKNOWN). NO PHOTO IS AVAILABLE. TYPE OF THE SURGERY WAS DISTAL FIBULA FRACTURE REPAIR. NO SIGNIFICANT SURGERY DELAY REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA ADMINISTERED TO THE PATIENT. NO INFORMATION ABOUT AN INSTRUMENT USED TO PREPARE/TAP THE BONE SOCKET FOR INSERTION OF THE IMPLANT. BONE QUALITY OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 23477164 ↗MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE LAPIDUS ARTHRODESIS WITH A PLANTAR LAPIDUS PLATE THAT THE FRONT PART OF THE INSTRUMENT, WHERE THE THREAD IS LOCATED, BROKE OFF WHEN SCREWING IT IN TO FIX THE PLATE. THE BROKEN PART COULD BE REMOVED WITHOUT FURTHER DAMAGE. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23295438 ↗MalfunctionJan 23, 2025Break; Break
ON 12/23/2024 IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA (B)(4) THAT AN AR-13226TS BB-TAK. PIN BROKE AND REMAINED IN BONE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING THE CASE WITH NO PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 21217731 ↗MalfunctionAug 23, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MTPJ REVISION (USING 2MM LOCKING OPENING WEDGE PLATE) THE BB-TAK BROKE. THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20045696 ↗MalfunctionDec 2, 2022Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LISFRANC PLATING SURGERY PARTS OF THE DEVICE SHEARED OFF DURING USE. ALL PARTS WERE RETRIEVED OUT OF THE PATIENT. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY REPORTED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15905615 ↗MalfunctionJun 20, 2022Break
IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2022 BY A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE VIA SEMS THAT AN AR-13226TS BB-TAK BROKE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A CASE AND BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT. PER FACILITY: "IT WAS USED TO FIX THE FIBULA PLATE. THE AREA BETWEEN THE HEAD AND SHAFT WAS BROKEN OFF."
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14744816 ↗MalfunctionFeb 14, 2022Break
ON (B)(6) 2022 IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA SEMS THAT AN AR-13226TS TREADED BB-TAK BROKE DURING A SURGERY. THE THREADED PART BROKE WHILE INSERTING INTO THE BONE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY HOWEVER, THE BROKEN PIECE WAS NOT RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 13528460 ↗
Other Orthopedic manual surgical instrument devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page