Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-8933-18SRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · LO-PRO SCRW,TI,3.0MMX 18MMCORT, STRL · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867210530), received between Mar 14, 2022 and Jul 22, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Defective Device1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 22, 2025Defective Device; Defective Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ARTRODESIS FOREFOOT SURGERY THE SURGEON PULLED OUT ONE 16 AND ONE 18 MILLIMETER SCREW (AR-8933-18S, LOT: 15225963), BUT THEY WERE BOTH 16 MM SCREWS IN THIS CASE. IT WAS WRONGLY MARKED. THE SURGEON USED ONE OF THE 16 MM SCREWS AND THREW AWAY THE OTHER (AR-8933-18S, LOT: 15225963), AS IT HAD ALREADY BEEN IN THE WOUND. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22566841 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 29, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGERY THE SCREWS INSERTED INTO PATIENT BUT HEAD OF SCREW SHEARED OFF. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT SHAFTS REMAINED IN PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 18808588 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 18, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINTS (MTP JOINTS) SURGERY OF THE FIRST METATARSAL JOINT WHEN FILLING THE OBLONG HOLE ON THE STANDARD LEFT CONTOURED PLATE THE 3MM X 18MM CORTICAL SCREW HEAD SNAPPED AND THE SCREW WAS NOW NOT RETRIEVABLE FROM HOLE WITHOUT HEAD TO HOLD TO DRIVE OUT. THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE FELT OR ANYTHING UNUSUAL PRIOR TO DRIVING SCREW INTO HOLE AND ALL CORRECT DRILL/ GUIDES WERE USED AS PER OPTECH AND INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEM. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY OCCURRED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 18352112 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 14, 2022Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TARSOMETATARSAL FUSION SURGERY USING THE 5 HOLE 3MM STRAIGHT PLATE THE SURGEON IMPLANTED A 3X18MM CORTICAL SCREW. WHEN TIGHTENING THE SCREW THE HEAD SHEERED OFF WITH A CLEAN BREAK. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO CONTINUE AND COMPLETE THE SURGERY BUT THE SCREW SHAFT WAS LEFT IN PLACE, NOT PROMINENTLY, BUT HE WAS UNABLE TO REMOVE IT. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY OCCURRED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH THE SAME DEVICE. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13759028 ↗

Other Screw, fixation, bone devices

All Screw, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page