Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-1927PSF-475Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · SUTR ANCH, PEEK, CS FT, TRI-PLAY, 4.75MM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867238602), received between Oct 30, 2019 and Sep 17, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 17, 2024Break; Break

    ON 09/4/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-1927PSF-475 PEEK CORKSCREW FT BROKE DURING INSERTION. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER AR-1927PSF-475 PEEK CORKSCREW FT. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN RCR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 9/11/2024: ALL THE BROKEN FRAGMENTS WERE SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. THE CASE WAS NOT DELAYED, AND ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS NOT NEEDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20238737 ↗
  • InjuryJun 19, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-2324BCC SUTURELOCK AND AR-1927PSF-475 CORKSCREW ANCHOR WERE IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023. PATIENT RETURNED TO THE FACILITY WITH AN INFECTION ON (B)(6) 2023. THIS HAS NOT BEEN A REVISION SCHEDULED AS OF (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17152385 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 26, 2021Break

    ON (B)(6) 2021, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT (2) AR-1927PSF-475 PEEK CORKSCREW BROKE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021, WHEN SURGEON PUNCHED IN PREPARATION FOR IMPLANT, BOTH SUTURE ANCHOR PEEK CORKSCREW BROKE DURING INSERTION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12696960 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 26, 2021Break; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2021, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT (2) AR-1927PSF-475 PEEK CORKSCREW BROKE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021, WHEN SURGEON PUNCHED IN PREPARATION FOR IMPLANT, BOTH SUTURE ANCHOR PEEK CORKSCREW BROKE DURING INSERTION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12696947 ↗
  • InjuryOct 30, 2019Break; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR PROCEDURE, THE AR-1927PSF-475 SUTURE ANCHOR PEEK CORKSCREW BROKE UPON INSERTION. THE REP STATED THE TIP OF THE CORKSCREW WAS LEFT IN THE BONE, AND THE REMAINDER OF THE IMPLANT WAS RETRIEVED BY USING A GRASPER. A NEW HOLE WAS DRILLED BY USING THE AR-1927PTB-475, PUNCH/TAP (LOT: 011919) AND A SECOND AR-1927PSF-475 FROM THE SAME LOT WAS IMPLANTED WITHOUT ISSUE. HOWEVER, AS THE SURGEON WAS DRILLING THE NEW HOLE THE TIP OF THE AR-1927PTB-475 BENT. THE REP REPORTED NOTHING BROKE OFF FROM THE PUNCH/TAP. THE RETRIEVED BROKEN PORTION OF THE CORKSCREW AND THE BENT PUNCH/TAP WILL BE RETURNING FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 9254968 ↗

Other Screw, fixation, bone devices

All Screw, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page