Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-8750-50HRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · COMPR FT SCRW, 5.0 LG, 50MM LGTH · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867262966), received between Dec 20, 2019 and Nov 8, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Material Deformation1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant1
  • Fever1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 8, 2024Break; Break

    ON 10/16/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA (B)(4) THAT AN AR-8750-03 DRIVER SHAFT, T15 HEXALOBE, CANNULATED HAD THE TIP OF THE SCREW BREAK OFF IN THE HEAD OF THE SCREW WHEN THE SURGEON WAS TRYING TO BACK OUT THE SCREW. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, WITH NO PIECES BREAKING OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A HARDWARE REMOVAL PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024, WITH NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 11/04/2024: THERE WAS NO CASE DELAY. THE HARDWARE REMOVAL PROCEDURE WAS FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE ARTHREX PART AR-8750-50H 5.0 LARGE COMPRESSION FT SCREW, WHICH WAS EXPLANTED DURING THE SURGERY. AT THIS TIME, IT IS UNKNOWN WHY THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY. NO ARTHREX PRODUCTS WERE IMPLANTED DURING THIS SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 20642248 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 26, 2022Break; Material Deformation

    ON (B)(6) 2022, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-8750-42H, AN AR-8750-46H, AND AN AR-8750-50H HAD ISSUES. DURING A FULKERSON OSTEOTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022, ALL THREE COMPLAINT DEVICES WERE IMPLANTED, AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A POST-OP INFECTION THREE WEEKS AFTER SURGERY. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE X-RAY WAS SHOWING THAT 2 OF 3 SCREWS WERE BENDING. ON (B)(6) 2022, ON THE NEXT X-RAY, ONE OF THE SCREWS HAD BROKEN POST-OP INSIDE THE PATIENT. ON (B)(6) 2022, TWO OF THE SCREWS WERE BROKEN INSIDE THE PATIENT POST-OP. ACCORDING TO THE X-RAY AND THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE, IT WAS ASSUMED THAT THE AR-8750-50H AND AR-8750-46H WERE BROKEN. THE BROKEN SCREWS WERE SECURELY AFFIXED INSIDE THE PATIENT, AND THE SURGEON WAS NOT PLANNING A REVISION SURGERY AND DEEMED IT SAFE TO LEAVE THE BROKEN SCREWS INSIDE THE PATIENT, BUT JUST WANTED TO HAVE THE COMPLAINT REPORTED. THE PATIENT IS FINE TO DATE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 15484137 ↗
  • InjuryDec 20, 2019Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED AFTER FOOT RECONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE ARTHROCELL WAS USED. THE PATIENT HAD AN ADVERSE REACTION INCLUDING FEVER SPIKES ONE DAY POST-OP. THERE WERE ALSO FOUR SCREWS AND TWO STAPLES IMPLANTED. NO REVISION IS PLANNED AT THIS TIME. CURRENTLY THE DOCTOR IS RESEARCHING THE SOURCE OF THE REACTION.

    Patient problems: Fever

    MAUDE report 9506213 ↗

Other Plate, fixation, bone devices

All Plate, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page