Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-4020C-10Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · Ø10X 20MM BC IF SCRW, VENTED · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867276987), received between Mar 31, 2021 and Feb 11, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 2 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Positioning Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Failure of Implant2
  • Cyst(s)1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Synovitis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 11, 2026Material Deformation; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 15-JUN-2026:THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ACL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE LEFT KNEE ON (b)(6) 2025. ON (b)(6) 2025 (7 MONTHS POST-OPERATIVELY), THE PATIENT NOTED INCREASED SWELLING AND A NODULE BENEATH THE TIBIAL INCISION. DUE TO PERSISTENT SYMPTOMS, FURTHER EVALUATION WAS PERFORMED ON (b)(6) 2025. MRI OBTAINED ON (b)(6) 2025 DEMONSTRATED TIBIAL TUNNEL CYSTS WITH A 2.3 CM MULTILOCULAR PRETIBIAL CYSTIC LESION.DURING THE REVISION PROCEDURE ON (b)(6) 2026, EXCISION OF THE PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED AR-4020C-10 FASTTHREAD BIOCOMPOSITE INTERFERENCE SCREW (10 X 20 MM) AND CYSTIC CHANNELS WAS PERFORMED WITH SUBSEQUENT BONE GRAFTING. INTRAOPERATIVELY, CATABOLIC TISSUE WAS NOTED WITHIN THE TIBIAL TUNNEL.

    Patient problems: Cyst(s); Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 24315953 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 21, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT SURGERY ONE SCREW BROKE IN THE FEMUR AND THE OTHER SCREW BROKE IN THE TIBIA. PER COMPLAINT REPORTER THERE WAS NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE WITH THE SAME PART NUMBER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24130584 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 9, 2025Positioning Failure; Failure to Advance; Positioning Failure; Failure to Advance

    ON 06/12/2025, A DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED VIA EMAIL THAT (QTY. 2) OF AN AR-4570-24 FIBERSTITCH IMPLANT FAILED FIXATION IN THE MENISCUS. WHILE THE FAILURE WAS ATTRIBUTED TO THE QUALITY OF THE MENISCUS, THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO COMPLETE THE INTENDED REPAIR USING EITHER DEVICE. FOLLOWING THIS, AN AR-4020C-10 FASTTHREAD BIOCOMPOSITE INTERFERENCE SCREW WAS INSERTED BUT DID NOT SEAT PROPERLY. A LARGER SCREW WAS THEN REQUESTED, WHICH ACHIEVED FIXATION AND WAS FURTHER REINFORCED WITH A SWIVELOCK. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025, WITH NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED ON 06/24/2025.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22455797 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 25, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    UPDATE NROE 25-JAN-2024: FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED AND REVEALED THAT THE INCIDENT OCCURRED DURING AN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18582087 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 25, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    UPDATE NROE 25-JAN-2024: FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED AND REVEALED THAT THE INCIDENT OCCURRED DURING AN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A NEW DEVICE FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18582081 ↗
  • InjuryOct 6, 2023Break; Break

    ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A RIGHT ACL REVISION RECONSTRUCTION WITH AUTOGRAFT, MEDIAL MENISCUS REPAIR, AND PARTIAL LATERAL MENISCECTOMY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE COURSE OF THE OPERATION, IN PERFORMING A REPAIR OF THE MEDIAL MENISCUS, AN INTRA-MENISCAL REPAIR DEVICE CALLED A FIBERSTITCH MADE BY ARTHREX WAS USED TO REPAIR THE MEDIAL MENISCUS. DURING THE MENISCUS REPAIR, A PORTION OF THE DEVICE BROKE AND WAS LEFT BEHIND IN THE PATIENT¿S KNEE. ALSO, DURING THIS PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON CLEARED THE KNEE OF A PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED GRAFT AND FIBERWIRE SUTURES. BETWEEN (B)(6) 2021, AND (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT HAD CONTINUOUS CALLS AND FOLLOW-UPS WITH HIS PHYSICIAN REPORTING SIGNIFICANT PAIN. ON (B)(6) 2021, AN X-RAY WAS TAKEN, WHICH REVEALED A FOREIGN BODY INSIDE THE RIGHT KNEE. ON (B)(6) 2021, A SECOND SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE FOREIGN BODY. DURING THE REMOVAL PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD SIGNIFICANT SYNOVITIS THROUGHOUT THE KNEE JOINT WITH FAILED MEDIAL MENISCUS REPAIR AND A RETAINED DEVICE FRAGMENT. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE FRAGMENT WAS 2 CM IN LENGTH. THE MEDIAL MENISCUS WAS NOT REPAIRED AT THIS TIME. THE PATIENT HAS HAD CONTINUED PAIN, INFECTIONS,

    Patient problems: Synovitis

    MAUDE report 17890061 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2022Break

    ON (B)(6) 2022, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-4020C-10 FASTTHREAD BIOCOMPOSITE INTERFERENCE SCREW BROKE IN HALF AS IT WAS GETTING INSERTED. INITIALLY THE SURGEON WAS HAVING TROUBLE LOADING THE DRIVER ON THE SCREW, AS IT WAS NOT SEATING PROPERLY, EVENTUALLY SURGEON WAS ABLE TO SCREW IN IT WHEN IT BROKE. EVERYTHING WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT AND CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER AR-4020C-10 SCREW WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN ACL RECONSTRUCTION WITH PATELLA ALLOGRAFT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2022.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14136560 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 31, 2021Break; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING AN ACL MENISCUS REPAIR THE FIRST IMPLANT DEPLOYED BUT DID NOT STAY IMPLANTED AND CAME BACK OUT. IT WAS REPLACED AND THE CASE WAS CONTINUED. THEN WHEN THE AR-4020C-10 SCREW WAS IMPLANTED IT BROKE ON INSERTION. ALL WAS RETRIEVED AND IT WAS REPLACED WITH AN AR-4030C-10 AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER ISSUES. THE PATIENT IS FINE TO DATE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11599061 ↗

Other Fastener, fixation, biodegradable, soft tissue devices

All Fastener, fixation, biodegradable, soft tissue devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page