Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-2326PSLCRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · PEEK SWIVELOCK, 3.9X17.9MM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867289154), received between May 26, 2023 and Feb 2, 2026 — classified as 9 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Advance3
  • Break2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Defective Device1
  • Mechanical Jam1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information4
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Failure of Implant1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 2, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ON 2ND FEBRUARY 2026, IT WAS REPORTED BY AN ARTHREX EMPLOYEE VIA EMAIL THAT FOR AN AR-2326PSLC, PEEK SWIVELOCK, 3.9X17.9MM, THE ANCHOR PULLED OUT FROM THE PATIENT'S HUMERAL HEAD FOLLOWING ATTEMPTED IMPLANTATION. THIS WAS DETECTED DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR PROCEDURE ON 12TH FEBRUARY 2026. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AS THEY USED A LARGER ANCHOR AS A SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE (AR-2324PSLC OPENED AND IMPLANTED.)

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24232756 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 17, 2025Break; Defective Device; Break; Defective Device

    ON 10/09/2025, A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-2325PSLC PEEK LABRAL SWIVELOCK SUTURE ANCHOR AND AN AR-2326PSLC PEEK SWIVELOCK ANCHOR WERE MISSHAPED AND BROKE UPON INSERTION. NO FURTHER DETAILS WERE PROVIDED. THE ISSUE WAS IDENTIFIED DURING A PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED ON 10/10/2025.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23328416 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 25, 2025Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam

    ON 02/12/2025, A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-2326PSLC PEEK SWIVELOCK ANCHOR HAD AN ISSUE WITH THE EYELET NOT RELEASING FROM THE ANCHOR INSERTER DURING A CASE. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO INSERT IT TWICE AND COULD NOT GET THE EYELET TO RELEASE, SO THE SURGEON WENT WITH A DIFFERENT ANCHOR THAT OPERATED SUCCESSFULLY AND COMPLETED THE CASE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN ARTHROSCOPIC RCR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025, WITH NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21460290 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 27, 2024Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    ON 20 SEPTEMBER 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT 2 X AR-2326PSLC PEEK SWIVELOCK, 3.9X17.9MM FAILED TO DEPLOY DURING USE. THIS OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2024 IN ASCOT HOSPITAL DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING A DIFFERENT ANCHOR. THERE WAS CASE INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20320438 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 26, 2024Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    ON 20 SEPTEMBER 2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT 2 X AR-2326PSLC PEEK SWIVELOCK, 3.9X17.9MM FAILED TO DEPLOY DURING USE. THIS OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2024 IN (B)(6) HOSPITAL DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY USING A DIFFERENT ANCHOR. THERE WAS CASE INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20314744 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 4, 2024Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ON 6/10/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-2326PSLC PEEK SWIVELOCK SUTURE ANCHOR HAD AN ISSUE. DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023, THE EYELET OF THE ANCHOR WOULD NOT COME OFF; IT WAS STUCK ON THE DEVICE. NOTHING BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT, AND THE SURGEON REMOVED EVERYTHING FROM THE PATIENT IN ONE PIECE WITH NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. AN AR-2324PSLC SUTURE ANCHOR, PEEK-SWIVELOCK, WITH LOT NUMBER 15221727, WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE SUCCESSFULLY. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. THERE WAS NO CASE DELAY, AND NO ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS ADMINISTERED. THIS OCCURRED DURING USE WITH NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19674250 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 2, 2024Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 3.9 MM PEEK SWIVELOCK WOULD NOT ADVANCE INTO THE PREPARED SOCKET. A 4.0 MM SOCKET WAS DRILLED AND THE ANCHOR WOULD STILL NOT ADVANCE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19444681 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 6, 2023Break; Break

    ON 6/8/2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-2326PSLC PEEK SWIVELOCK EYELET BROKE OFF AND THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO THREAD IT BACK ON. ALL THE BROKEN PIECES WERE RETRIEVED AND ANOTHER AR-2326PSLC PEEK SWIVELOCK WAS OPEN. THE SAME THING HAPPENED, THE SWIVELOCK BROKE AT THE PORTION WHERE IT THREADS ON. THE FRAGMENT WAS REMOVED SUCCESSFULLY, AND A THIRD AR-2326PSLC PEEK SWIVELOCK FROM A DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN RCR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17268029 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 26, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ON 5/4/2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-2326PSLC PEEK SWIVELOCK WAS BEING INSERTED IN THE BONE SOCKET WHEN THE SUTURES LET GO OF THE TENDON. THE SURGEON OPTED OUT OF A BICEP TENODESIS REPAIR AND COMPLETED THE CASE AS A TENOTOMY ON (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17011601 ↗

Other Fastener, fixation, biodegradable, soft tissue devices

All Fastener, fixation, biodegradable, soft tissue devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page