Arthrex® ABS-1981-16SRecalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · OATS Kit for 16mm Allograft Plugs · Class 1
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00888867295292), received between Aug 20, 2020 and Aug 20, 2020 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fitting Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fitting Problem1
Patient problems
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 20, 2020Fitting Problem
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SALES REP, WHO WAS PRESENT, THAT DURING A (B)(6) 2020 OCA CASE 16MM FRESH PLUGS FROM LIFENET (LIFENET ID: 2017189-7006, CODE: RFP16, EXP: 2020-08-14) AND AN ARTHREX 16MM OATS DISPOSABLE KIT, ABS- 1981-16S (LOT 10634212) WERE BEING USED. SURGEON IS WELL ACCUSTOMED TO ARTHREX OATS TECHNIQUES AND HAS PERFORMED MANY MEGA OATS CASE AND AUTOGRAFT OATS CASE WHERE ALL THE IMPLANTATION ARE PRESS FIT AS WELL. THE TECHNIQUE WHERE THE KIT AND PLUG ARE USED TOGETHER IS A PRESS FIT IMPLANTATION. WHEN THE PLUG WAS INSERTED DURING THIS PROCEDURE REPORTER STATES THEY COULD VISUALIZE THE INFERIOR BORDER OF THE PLUG WHICH WAS DESCRIBED TO BE NO WHERE NEAR PRESS FIT, YET EVEN LINE TO LINE WITH THE BORDER. REPORTER STATES ALL CORRECT TECHNIQUE PROTOCOLS FOR REAMING THE RECIPIENT HOLE AND THEN USING THE ALIGNMENT ROAD. SURGEON DOUBLE CHECK THE MEASUREMENTS OF THE FOUR QUADRANTS TWICE TO CONFIRM THE DEPTH OF THE DESIRED PLUG. REPORTER STATES HE WAS UNSURE IF THE MALFUNCTION WAS ON THE KIT DIES OR THE ACTUAL PLUG SIDE OF THE PROCEDURE. IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE DESIRED FIXATION A HEADLESS COMPRESSION SCREW WAS USED AS THE PLUG BY ITSELF WAS WOBBLY. PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE YOUNG AND HEA
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10431314 ↗
Other Orthopedic manual surgical instrument devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page