Arthrex® AR-7900Recalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · Zone Navigator · Class 1
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867300453), received between Sep 4, 2019 and Nov 9, 2023 — classified as 4 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Advance” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Advance3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Material Twisted/Bent2
- Separation Failure2
- Defective Device1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Unspecified Infection2
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 9, 2023Defective Device; Defective Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MENISCAL REPAIR SURGERY THE DEVICE AR-7900 (LOT: 15037948) DIDN'T TAKE THE NEEDLE. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON NO HARM FOR PATIENT, OPERATOR OR THIRD PARTY OCCURRED. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO DO A SECOND SURGERY. UPDATE AVOE 18-OCT-2023 IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER AND IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18102069 ↗MalfunctionDec 27, 2022Failure to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MENISCUS SURGERY THE NEEDLE COULD NOT BE ADVANCED AND SO THE SYSTEM INCLUDING THE AR-7905, AR-7910L AND AR-7900 DID NOT WORK. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE BY CHANGING TO AN OUTSIDE-IN PROCEDURE. IT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO SWITCH THE GENERAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OR DO A SECOND SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16052112 ↗InjuryMay 18, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT GOT AN INFECTION AFTER HE WAS TREATED WITH THE DEVICES AR-7900 (LOT: 10822462), AR-7910L (LOT: 928497924) AND AR-7523 (LOT: 934399472). THIS WAS NOTICED AFTER THE SURGERY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION RECEIVED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 11842561 ↗InjuryMay 18, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT GOT AN INFECTION AFTER HE WAS TREATED WITH THE DEVICES AR-7900 (LOT: 10822462), AR-7910L (LOT: 928497924) AND AR-7523 (LOT: 934399472). THIS WAS NOTICED AFTER THE SURGERY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION RECEIVED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 11842384 ↗InjurySep 4, 2019Failure to Advance; Separation Failure; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED DURING AN INSIDE-OUT MENISCAL REPAIR PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON USED TWO AR-7900 ZONE NAVIGATORS (LOT: 10297141 AND LOT: 10302082). THE REP STATED BOTH DEVICES MALFUNCTIONED IN THE SAME PROCEDURE. HOWEVER, IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH ISSUE OCCURRED WITH EACH SPECIFIC LOT. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SURGEON OPENED ONE AR-7900 AND A MID-POSTERIOR CANNULA. AFTER SLIDING THE CANNULA ON TOP, THE SURGEON NEEDED TO ADJUST THE CANNULA. UPON ATTEMPTING TO ADJUST THE CANNULA, IT WAS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO TAKE OFF THE CANNULA WITH THE GREY BUTTON DEPRESSED ALL THE WAY DOWN ON THE HANDLE. A SECOND AR-7900 WAS OPENED AND THE CANNULA WAS ABLE TO BE ADJUSTED MUCH BETTER. HOWEVER, THE NEEDLE WAS BENT AND NOT SLIDING EASILY INTO THE HANDPIECE SO THE SURGEON SWITCHED HANDPIECES WITH THE RECOMMENDATION TO USE FRESH NEEDLES. AS THE SURGEON SLID THE NEEDLE THROUGH AND TRIED TO ADVANCE IT, THE TOLERANCE WAS EXTREMELY TIGHT AND THE NEEDLE WOULD NOT ADVANCE THROUGH. AT THIS POINT THE SURGEON THEN SWITCHED TO AN OUTSIDE-IN TECHNIQUE DUE TO ONLY HAVING ONE TECH SCRUBBED IN. THE SALES REP REPORTED THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE REP CONFIRMED NO INSTRUMENT BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORM
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8961163 ↗InjurySep 4, 2019Failure to Advance; Separation Failure; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED DURING AN INSIDE-OUT MENISCAL REPAIR PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON USED TWO AR-7900 ZONE NAVIGATORS (LOT: 10297141 AND LOT: 10302082). THE REP STATED BOTH DEVICES MALFUNCTIONED IN THE SAME PROCEDURE. HOWEVER, IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH ISSUE OCCURRED WITH EACH SPECIFIC LOT. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SURGEON OPENED ONE AR-7900 AND A MID-POSTERIOR CANNULA. AFTER SLIDING THE CANNULA ON TOP, THE SURGEON NEEDED TO ADJUST THE CANNULA. UPON ATTEMPTING TO ADJUST THE CANNULA, IT WAS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO TAKE OFF THE CANNULA WITH THE GREY BUTTON DEPRESSED ALL THE WAY DOWN ON THE HANDLE. A SECOND AR-7900 WAS OPENED AND THE CANNULA WAS ABLE TO BE ADJUSTED MUCH BETTER. HOWEVER, THE NEEDLE WAS BENT AND NOT SLIDING EASILY INTO THE HANDPIECE SO THE SURGEON SWITCHED HANDPIECES WITH THE RECOMMENDATION TO USE FRESH NEEDLES. AS THE SURGEON SLID THE NEEDLE THROUGH AND TRIED TO ADVANCE IT, THE TOLERANCE WAS EXTREMELY TIGHT AND THE NEEDLE WOULD NOT ADVANCE THROUGH. AT THIS POINT THE SURGEON THEN SWITCHED TO AN OUTSIDE-IN TECHNIQUE DUE TO ONLY HAVING ONE TECH SCRUBBED IN. THE SALES REP REPORTED THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE REP CONFIRMED NO INSTRUMENT BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORM
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8961134 ↗
Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page