Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-9619-45Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · 45mm Peripheral Reamer · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00888867308930), received between Nov 11, 2024 and Nov 11, 2024 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 11, 2024Break; Break

    ON (B)(6) 2024, A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA (B)(4) THAT AN AR-9619-45 45MM REAMER BROKE DURING A CASE. ALL BROKEN PIECES WERE RETRIEVED, AND THE CASE WAS CONTINUED. LATER, DURING THE CASE, THE AR-9530L-03 REVERS TRIAL WAS USED, AND THE REP NOTICED IT HAD A LOT OF WEAR AND TEAR AND WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED FOR THE NEXT TIME. IT WAS USED A LOT, AND PIECES WERE FALLING OFF. THE REP CONFIRMED NOTHING FELL INTO THE PATIENT TRIAL, AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A SIGNIFICANT DELAY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20653742 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page