Arthrex® AR-8934BCSTRecalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · 3.0 SINGLE LOADED SUTURETAPE S-TAK ASSY · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867375116), received between Oct 3, 2022 and Mar 16, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Patient Device Interaction Problem4
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Failure to Advance1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient3
- Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction2
- Loss of Range of Motion2
- Pain2
- Swelling/ Edema2
- Insufficient Information1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 16, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem
ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT REPORTED VIA PHONE THAT THEY UNDERWENT A LEFT ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY WITH BROSTROM REPAIR AND INTERNAL BRACE ON (B)(6) 2025. APPROXIMATELY FIVE WEEKS POSTOPERATIVELY, THEY BEGAN EXPERIENCING A SENSATION OF SOMETHING ¿POKING THROUGH THE SKIN,¿ IRRITATION, DECREASED RANGE OF MOTION, AND SHARP PAIN DURING WEIGHT-BEARING. THE PATIENT STATED THEY INITIATED PHYSICAL THERAPY ON (B)(6) 2025 AND HAVE SINCE EXPERIENCED A PROGRESSIVE DECLINE IN RANGE OF MOTION. THEY RATED THEIR CURRENT PAIN AS 8¿10 OUT OF 10. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT RECENT MRI FINDINGS SHOWED MILD BONE SWELLING AROUND THE ANCHOR, AND AVASCULAR NECROSIS WAS SUSPECTED, ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT YET VISIBLE ON THE MRI. THE (B)(6) 2025 PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO ADDRESS CHRONIC LEFT ANKLE INSTABILITY FOLLOWING A SEVERE SPRAIN THAT HAD NOT HEALED ADEQUATELY. THE PATIENT ALSO REPORTED BEING INSTRUCTED NOT TO USE ASSISTIVE DEVICES SUCH AS CRUTCHES OR A BRACE DURING RECOVERY. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, NO REVISION SURGERY IS PLANNED. THE ARTHREX IMPLANTS IMPLANTED IN THE LEFT ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY WITH BROSTROM REPAIR AND INTERNAL BRACE ON (B)(6) 2025 INCLUDE AR-1788J-CP INTERNALBRACE IMPLANT SYSTEM, LIGAMENT AUGMENTATI
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Loss of Range of Motion; Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 24605341 ↗InjuryMar 16, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem
ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT REPORTED VIA PHONE THAT THEY UNDERWENT A LEFT ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY WITH BROSTROM REPAIR AND INTERNAL BRACE ON (B)(6) 2025. APPROXIMATELY FIVE WEEKS POSTOPERATIVELY, THEY BEGAN EXPERIENCING A SENSATION OF SOMETHING ¿POKING THROUGH THE SKIN,¿ IRRITATION, DECREASED RANGE OF MOTION, AND SHARP PAIN DURING WEIGHT-BEARING. THE PATIENT STATED THEY INITIATED PHYSICAL THERAPY ON (B)(6) 2025 AND HAVE SINCE EXPERIENCED A PROGRESSIVE DECLINE IN RANGE OF MOTION. THEY RATED THEIR CURRENT PAIN AS 8¿10 OUT OF 10.THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT RECENT MRI FINDINGS SHOWED MILD BONE SWELLING AROUND THE ANCHOR, AND AVASCULAR NECROSIS WAS SUSPECTED, ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT YET VISIBLE ON THE MRI. THE (B)(6) 2025 PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO ADDRESS CHRONIC LEFT ANKLE INSTABILITY FOLLOWING A SEVERE SPRAIN THAT HAD NOT HEALED ADEQUATELY. THE PATIENT ALSO REPORTED BEING INSTRUCTED NOT TO USE ASSISTIVE DEVICES SUCH AS CRUTCHES OR A BRACE DURING RECOVERY. AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT, NO REVISION SURGERY IS PLANNED.THE ARTHREX IMPLANTS IMPLANTED IN THE LEFT ANKLE ARTHROSCOPY WITH BROSTROM REPAIR AND INTERNAL BRACE ON (B)(6) 2025 INCLUDE AR-1788J-CP INTERNALBRACE IMPLANT SYSTEM, LIGAMENT AUGMENTATION
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Loss of Range of Motion; Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 24605021 ↗MalfunctionFeb 23, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
ON 1/31/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT THE SUTURETAPE FROM AN AR-8934BCST SINGLE LOADED SUTURETAPE S-TAK ASSY PULLED OUT OF THE ANCHOR, AND THE ANCHOR REMAINED IN THE BONE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A KIDNER PROCEDURE. NOTHING BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT, AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE CASE WAS NOT DELAYED, AND ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS NOT NEEDED. THE PATIENT SUFFERED NO NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON OR AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 18768688 ↗MalfunctionFeb 14, 2024Failure to Advance; Failure to Advance
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECONCEIVED ON 2/8/2024: THE CASE WAS NOT DELAYED, AND NO ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS NEEDED. THE PATIENT SUFFERED NO NEGATIVE EFFECTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18702778 ↗InjuryJul 24, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
ON 06/27/2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A RELATIVE OF A PATIENT, VIA PHONE, THAT THE PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING A REACTION 3 WEEKS AFTER UNDERGOING A RIGHT DE ROTATIONAL FEMORAL OSTEOTOMY WITH ALLOGRAFT AND MPSL RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFT ON (B)(6) 2023 IN WHICH (2) AR-8934BCST SUTURE TAPES, AN AR-8719MXDS-2015 DYNANITE STAPLE, AND AN AR-4030P-07 PEEK INTERFERENCE SCREW WERE IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL AFTER EXPERIENCING A BREAKOUT OF HIVES. THE PATIENT IS BEING TREATED WITH STEROIDS AND OTHER ANTIHISTAMINES THAT ARE KEEPING HER STABLE. THE PATIENT IS AWAITING ALLERGY TESTING. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction
MAUDE report 17377278 ↗InjuryJul 24, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
ON (B)(6) 2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A RELATIVE OF A PATIENT, VIA PHONE, THAT THE PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING A REACTION 3 WEEKS AFTER UNDERGOING A RIGHT DE ROTATIONAL FEMORAL OSTEOTOMY WITH ALLOGRAFT AND MPSL RECONSTRUCTION WITH ALLOGRAFT ON (B)(6) 2023 IN WHICH (2) AR-8934BCST SUTURE TAPES, AN AR-8719MXDS-2015 DYNANITE STAPLE, AND AN AR-4030P-07 PEEK INTERFERENCE SCREW WERE IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL AFTER EXPERIENCING A BREAKOUT OF HIVES. THE PATIENT IS BEING TREATED WITH STEROIDS AND OTHER ANTIHISTAMINES THAT ARE KEEPING HER STABLE. THE PATIENT IS AWAITING ALLERGY TESTING. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED.
Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction
MAUDE report 17377040 ↗MalfunctionOct 3, 2022Break
IT WAS REPORTED ON 09/16/2022 BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-8934BCST SUTURE TAPE ASSEMBLY ANCHOR BROKE WHILE BEING MALLETED IN. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A CASE AND BROKE INSIDE THE JOINT SPACE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 15534088 ↗
Other Screw, fixation, bone devices
- NA 03.043.029Synthes GmbH · Screw, fixation, bone503 reports
- OSTEORAPTOR 72201995Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Screw, fixation, bone253 reports
- Control 360 SK12Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone195 reports
- HEALIX PEEK ORTHOCORD 222205Medos International Sàrl · Screw, fixation, bone186 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-400Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-225Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-350Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-300Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page