Arthrex® AR-9928BCK-DXRecalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · BC ACHILLES SPDBRG W/ KL DX CC, 3.9 MM · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867425736), received between Mar 26, 2024 and Apr 17, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Break1
- Crack1
- Defective Device1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 17, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
ON 03/20/2025, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-9928BCK-DX ACHILLES SPEEDBRIDGE FIBERTAPE WAS NOT SWEDGED TOGETHER AND A SWIVELLOCK EYELET AND SUTURES CAME OUT WHEN INSERTED. THIS OCCURRED DURING USE IN A CASE WITH NO PATIENT EFFECT. CASE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER SWIVELLOCK. DELAY IN CASE WAS 30 MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21859733 ↗MalfunctionJan 3, 2025Break; Crack; Break; Crack
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 01/02/2025: THE CRACKED ANCHOR WAS RETRIEVED AND THEN RE-INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT. HOWEVER, THE ANCHOR WAS SLIGHTLY DAMAGED AND HAD TO BE TRIMMED OFF BY A FEW MILLIMETERS AT THE TOP LAYER OF THE BONE TO ENSURE IT WAS FLUSH. THE ANCHOR WAS FLUSH AT THE END OF THE REPAIR. NO REVISION SURGERY WAS NEEDED, AND NO CASE DELAY WAS REPORTED. NO ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE PATIENT WERE REPORTED. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING A HAGLUNDS BONE SPUR REMOVAL AND ACHILLES REPAIR ON (B)(6) 2024.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21070738 ↗MalfunctionApr 12, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
ON 3/20/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT THE SOLIDER REPAIR STITCH OF ONE OF THE FIBERTAK FROM AN AR-9928BCK-DX BIOCOMPOSITE ACHILLES SPEEDBRIDGE IMPLANT SYSTEM PULLED OUT OF THE ANCHOR. THE SURGEON INSERTED THE PROXIMOLATERAL KNOTLESS FIBERTAK, AND WHEN THE SOLID REPAIR STITCH WAS PULLED, THE STITCH PULLED OUT OF THE ANCHOR ALONG WITH THE KNOTLESS MECHANISM. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING THE EXISTING ANCHOR¿S TAPES AND MAKING A TRADITIONAL SPEEDBRIDGE. THE KNOTLESS RIPSTOP WAS NOT COMPLETED BECAUSE THERE WAS NO REPAIR STITCH OR KNOTLESS MECHANISM IN THE FAULTY ANCHOR AFTER IT PULLED OUT. THE CASE WAS DELAYED ABOUT FIVE MINUTES. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING AN ACHILLES SPEEDBRIDGE PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 19096771 ↗MalfunctionMar 26, 2024Defective Device; Defective Device
ON 3/8/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-9928BCK-DX ACHILLES SPEEDBRIDGE REPAIR IMPLANT SYSTEM HAD AN ISSUE DURING AN ACHILLES REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024. THE FIBERTAK IN THAT SYSTEM SHOULD ONLY HAVE ONE LOOP PER ANCHOR, BUT ONE OF THE TWO FIBERTAK DEVICES HAD TWO LOOPS INSTEAD AND COULD NOT BE USED. THIS WAS DISCOVERED UPON INSERTION INTO THE PATIENT, AND THE TECHNIQUE COULD NOT BE DONE CORRECTLY DUE TO THE DOUBLE-LOOPED SUTURE. THE SUTURES OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WERE THEN CUT AND REMOVED, AND THE ANCHOR REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. NOTHING BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE RIPSTOP OF THE PROCEDURE WAS ELIMINATED. THE OTHER FIBERTAK WAS USED WITHOUT ANY ISSUES. BOTH ANCHORS WERE LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT, AND THE SPEED BRIDGE PART OF THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, BUT NOT THE RIPSTOP PART. THE ACHILLES REPAIR PROCEDURE WAS STILL COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, BUT NOT ACCORDING TO THE TECHNIQUE GUIDE. THE SURGEON DEEMED EVERYTHING TO BE AFFIXED CORRECTLY, AND THERE WAS NO HARM OR ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE PATIENT. A CASE DELAY OF 90 MINUTES WAS REPORTED, AND IT COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED WHETHER ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS ADMINISTERED TO THE PATIENT. NO PICTURES OR
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 18980996 ↗
Other Screw, Fixation, Bone devices
- NA 03.043.029Synthes GmbH · Screw, fixation, bone503 reports
- OSTEORAPTOR 72201995Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Screw, fixation, bone253 reports
- Control 360 SK12Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone195 reports
- HEALIX PEEK ORTHOCORD 222205Medos International Sàrl · Screw, fixation, bone186 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-400Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-225Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-350Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Bone Transport System STP3.5-300Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Screw, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page