Skip to content

Zimmer® Nexel® Total Elbow 00-8400-024-11Recalls & reported problems

Zimmer, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Zimmer Nexel Total Elbow (13)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889024271296), received between Apr 24, 2025 and Jul 20, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2

Patient problems

  • Aseptic loosening1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Medical device site infection1
  • Osteolysis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 20, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A SECOND RIGHT TOTAL ELBOW REVISION DUE TO INFECTION, LOOSENING, AND LYSIS. THE PATIENT HAD PREVIOUSLY UNDERGONE AN INITIAL RIGHT TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. THE PATIENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY REVISED FOR THE FIRST TIME. DURING THE FIRST REVISION, EXTENSIVE METALLOSIS WAS NOTED, ASSOCIATED WITH A FAILED CENTRAL PIN AND BEARING WEAR. THE HUMERAL AND ULNA IMPLANTS WERE WELL FIXED AT THAT TIME. ALL IMPLANTS WERE REVISED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS. APPROXIMATELY SIX YEARS AND NINE MONTHS AFTER THE FIRST REVISION, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SECOND REVISION DUE TO INFECTION, LOOSENING, AND LYSIS. DELAMINATION OF THE HUMERAL COMPONENT WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE, AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening; Medical device site infection; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 25873240 ↗
  • InjuryApr 24, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ELBOW REVISION APPROXIMATELY SEVEN (7) MONTHS POST-IMPLANTATION DUE TO SQUEAKING OF ELBOW AND EXCESSIVE ROM. THE SURGEON ORIGINALLY PLANNED TO REVISE DISTAL BODY; HOWEVER, THE WHOLE IMPLANT WAS LOOSE AND WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 21898695 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, ELBOW, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, ELBOW, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page