Skip to content

Optio-C® 07.01873.007Recalls & reported problems

Zimmer Spine, Inc. · Class 2

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889024329607), received between Aug 3, 2020 and Jan 26, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 26, 2026Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO 7MM OPTIO-C PEEK CAGES DID NOT ASSEMBLE CORRECTLY TO THEIR MATING PLATES INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE CONNECTION WAS TOO LOOSE AND THEY WOULD NOT STAY ATTACHED TOGETHER. THE ATTEMPTED ASSEMBLY WAS PERFORMED AT THE BACK TABLE AND THEY WERE REPLACED WITH ADDITIONAL IMPLANTS TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT ANY IMPACTS TO THE PATIENT. THIS IS REPORT TWO OF FOUR FOR THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24179971 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 28, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE SURGEON IMPLANTED THE OPTIO-C DEVICE BY IMPACTING IT IN ORDER TO GET THE IMPLANT SEATED, AND AS THE SURGEON WAS IN THE PROCESS OF FINAL TIGHTENING, THE LOCKING PLATE BROKE. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE IMPLANT AND USED A DIFFERENT ONE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS A 10-MINUTE DELAY WITHOUT ANY IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17637465 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 3, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE PLATE DISASSEMBLED. IT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SAME SIZED PLATE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10359869 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.