Optio-C® 07.01873.007Recalls & reported problems
Zimmer Spine, Inc. · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889024329607), received between Aug 3, 2020 and Jan 26, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 26, 2026Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO 7MM OPTIO-C PEEK CAGES DID NOT ASSEMBLE CORRECTLY TO THEIR MATING PLATES INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE CONNECTION WAS TOO LOOSE AND THEY WOULD NOT STAY ATTACHED TOGETHER. THE ATTEMPTED ASSEMBLY WAS PERFORMED AT THE BACK TABLE AND THEY WERE REPLACED WITH ADDITIONAL IMPLANTS TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT ANY IMPACTS TO THE PATIENT. THIS IS REPORT TWO OF FOUR FOR THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24179971 ↗MalfunctionAug 28, 2023Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE SURGEON IMPLANTED THE OPTIO-C DEVICE BY IMPACTING IT IN ORDER TO GET THE IMPLANT SEATED, AND AS THE SURGEON WAS IN THE PROCESS OF FINAL TIGHTENING, THE LOCKING PLATE BROKE. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE IMPLANT AND USED A DIFFERENT ONE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS A 10-MINUTE DELAY WITHOUT ANY IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17637465 ↗MalfunctionAug 3, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE PLATE DISASSEMBLED. IT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SAME SIZED PLATE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10359869 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices
- NA 03.617.902Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical103 reports
- NA 03.617.900Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical77 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626525Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical75 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626526Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical49 reports
- NA 03.617.905Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical29 reports
- NA 03.617.904Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical27 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626746Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical21 reports
- NA 03.647.972Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical17 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.