INBONE 200347901Recalls & reported problems
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · Talar Stem · Class 2 · Implant
All models of INBONE (56)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This InBone Talar Stem is a metal ankle implant used in joint replacement surgery. The 46 reports mostly describe the stem failing to grow into the bone, loosening or shifting, and sometimes breaking, which left patients with pain, bone cysts and infection and needing revision surgery;45 injuries and no deaths were reported. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 46
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 45
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 46 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889797030830), received between May 5, 2022 and Feb 21, 2026 — classified as 45 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (18 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem18
- Osseointegration Problem18
- Insufficient Device Problem Information9
- Migration8
- Loss of Osseointegration3
- Break2
- Fracture2
- Biocompatibility1
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration22
- Cyst(s)12
- Implant Pain12
- Unspecified Infection9
- Insufficient Information7
- Pain6
- Bone Fracture(s)4
- Failure of Implant3
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 46 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 21, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY OF THE TALAR COMPONENTS FOR REASONS THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24410324 ↗InjuryFeb 19, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY FOR REASONS THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24390638 ↗InjuryFeb 9, 2026Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF INBONE TALUS COMPONENT. THE INFINITY TIBIA IS WELL FIXED. I NEED TO REVISE TO AN INVISION TALUS FOR SCREW OPTIONS IN PLATE SO MY UNDERSTANDING IS I WILL NEED TO REMOVE THE WELL FIXED INFINITY TIBIAL COMPONENT AS THE POLY WON'T MATCH THE INVISION TALUS.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 24299341 ↗InjuryJan 6, 2026Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO WORSENING PAIN AFTER BEING MONITORED FOR CYSTIC CHANGES FOR OVER 1 YEAR. THE LOOSENING OF THE IMPLANTS HAS PROGRESSED.
Patient problems: Cyst(s); Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain
MAUDE report 23973744 ↗InjuryNov 24, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO "ASEPTIC LOOSENING. FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION, LUCENCY RAPIDLY DEVELOPED UNDER THE TALAR IMPLANT. LUCENCY ABOUT THE TIBIAL IMPLANT APPEARED LATER. I SUSPECT THAT NEITHER IMPLANT WAS EVER INGROWN. BOTH TALAR AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS NEED TO BE REVISED. THE TALUS IS A LITTLE THIN AND THE EXISTING CENTRAL PEG ABUTS THE SUBCHONDRAL BONE OF THE SUBTALAR JOINT POSTERIOR FACET."
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23632764 ↗InjuryNov 24, 2025Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO "ASEPTIC LOOSENING. FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION, LUCENCY RAPIDLY DEVELOPED UNDER THE TALAR IMPLANT. LUCENCY ABOUT THE TIBIAL IMPLANT APPEARED LATER. I SUSPECT THAT NEITHER IMPLANT WAS EVER INGROWN. BOTH TALAR AND TIBIAL COMPONENTS NEED TO BE REVISED. THE TALUS IS A LITTLE THIN AND THE EXISTING CENTRAL PEG ABUTS THE SUBCHONDRAL BONE OF THE SUBTALAR JOINT POSTERIOR FACET."
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23632756 ↗InjuryNov 19, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT THE PATIENT REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY BECAUSE OF A STAGED REVISION APPROACH, REQUIRING THE IMPLANTING A CEMENT SPACER DUE TO PERITIBIAL CYSTIC LOOSENING WITH INFECTION. THE TIBIAL COMPONENT DEMONSTRATED LOOSENING. WITH THE TALAR COMPONENTS THE MORSE TAPER BETWEEN THE TALAR DOME AND THE TALAR STEM HAD NOT BEEN PROPERLY ENGAGED AND INSPECTION AFTER REMOVAL OF THE TALAR STEM REVEALED DELAMINATION OF THE PLASMA COATING.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 23596207 ↗InjuryNov 11, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ONGOING PAIN WITH WEIGHT BEARING AND THERE IS SOME OSTEOLYSIS BONE CYSTS UNDER THE TALAR COMPONENT.
Patient problems: Cyst(s); Inadequate Osseointegration; Osteolysis; Pain
MAUDE report 23525662 ↗InjuryNov 11, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY FOR REASONS CURRENTLY UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23524850 ↗InjuryNov 5, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY. THE PRIMARY IMPLANT CONSISTED OF A TIBIAL TRAY AND TALAR DOME. THE PATIENT LATER REQUIRED REMOVAL OF THE IMPLANT AND PLACEMENT OF AN ANTIBIOTIC CEMENT SPACER DUE TO SUSPECTED INFECTION, ALONG WITH NOTED POOR BONE QUALITY AND A LARGE BONE CYST SUPERIOR TO THE TIBIAL TRAY.
Patient problems: Arthritis; Cyst(s); Inadequate Osseointegration; Post Operative Wound Infection
MAUDE report 23479530 ↗InjurySep 15, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY OF BOTH THE TIBIAL AND TALAR COMPONENTS DUE TO POSSIBLE LOOSENING.
Patient problems: Cyst(s); Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23057108 ↗MalfunctionMay 15, 2025Material Erosion; Material Erosion
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT "WHEN DR. (B)(6) WAS IMPLANTING 200347901 (10MM TALAR STEM), SHE NOTICED THAT METAL WAS COMING OFF OF THE STEM AND INTO THE PATIENT'S BONE BEFORE IMPACTING". THERE WAS A 10-MINUTE DELAY WHILE A NEW IMPLANT WAS OPENED AND ASSEMBLED. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. ONCE THE STEM INSIDE THE ANKLE, THERE WAS A METAL RESIDUE THAT WAS LEFT INSIDE THE ANKLE IMMEDIATELY.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 22028600 ↗InjuryApr 29, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY OF BOTH THE TIBIAL AND TALAR COMPONENTS FOR REASONS OF INFECTION.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 21927938 ↗InjuryMar 26, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING PAIN AND MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY FOR REASONS THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 21701855 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2025Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility
THE PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCING A SEVERE ALLERGIC REACTION AND INFECTION RELATED TO THE METAL COMPONENTS IN A STRYKER PRODUCT. THEY ALSO ALLEGE CHRONIC FOOT PAIN CAUSED BY THE IMPLANTS AND HAVE REQUESTED AN ANKLE AMPUTATION, STATING THEY DO NOT BELIEVE THEY ARE A SUITABLE CANDIDATE FOR AN ANKLE PROSTHESIS. POSTOPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT¿S PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN EXAMINED THE ANKLE AND NOTED SIGNS CONSISTENT WITH INFECTION. THE PATIENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS. DURING A FOLLOW-UP WITH THE SURGEON, THEY WERE ADVISED TO USE NUMBER TWO COMPRESSION SOCKS. THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY SEEKING ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OPINIONS REGARDING NEXT STEPS AND HAS MENTIONED IDENTIFYING A SURGEON WHO MAY BE ABLE TO PERFORM THE ANKLE AMPUTATION.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Discomfort; Fever; Implant Pain; Unspecified Infection; Wound Dehiscence; Wound Odor
MAUDE report 21399962 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 21392541 ↗InjuryJan 27, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY OF BOTH THE TIBIAL, TALAR COMPONENTS AND POLY INSERT DUE TO INFECTION.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 21248810 ↗InjuryOct 28, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Unintended Movement; Osseointegration Problem; Unintended Movement
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT WILL UNDERGO A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO SEVERE LATERAL GUTTER IMPINGEMENT AS WELL AS THE ANTERIOR POSITIONING OF THE TALAR COMPONENT.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain
MAUDE report 20546249 ↗InjuryJul 10, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Migration; Osseointegration Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Migration
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY OF THE TALAR COMPONENT BECAUSE THE TALAR COLLAPSED. IT WAS DUE TO THE SCREW REMOVE HOLE AND A CYST IN THE ORIGINAL SURGERY.
Patient problems: Cyst(s); Inadequate Osseointegration; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 19715155 ↗InjuryJun 13, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Osseointegration Problem; Migration
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING PAIN AND MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO LOOSE TALAR COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Cyst(s); Implant Pain; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 19533070 ↗InjuryMar 6, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY OF BOTH SIDES OF THE IMPLANT USING INVISION IMPLANTS. PATIENT HAD CONTINUED PAIN AND CT SCAN SUGGESTS SOME LOOSENING OF AT LEAST THE TIBIAL COMPONENT.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 18852031 ↗InjuryFeb 28, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INDICATION OF CHRONICALLY PAINFUL TOTAL ANKLE AND PRESUMED ASEPTIC LOOSENING. JOINT ASPIRATION CULTURES NEGATIVE. JOINT FLUID SYNOVASURE NEGATIVE. BASED ON EXAM, SERIAL RADIOGRAPHS OVER THE PAST 18 MONTHS AND SPECT-CT, REASONABLE SUSPICION FOR AT LEAST TALAR COMPONENT LOOSENING. THE PHYSICIAN INTENDS TO REVISE TALUS, AT A MINIMUM, BUT WILL ASSESS TIBIAL COMPONENT STABILITY INTRAOPERATIVELY.
Patient problems: Cyst(s); Implant Pain; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 18803131 ↗InjuryFeb 26, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A DEVICE EXPLANT SURGERY DUE TO TALUS LOSS OF BONE. THE PATIENT RECEIVED A CEMENT SPACER.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 18783214 ↗InjuryFeb 15, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE DUE TO A PERI PROSTHETIC FRACTURE.
Patient problems: Limb Fracture; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18716990 ↗InjuryDec 13, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A RIGHT ANKLE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2015, AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH WRIGHT INBONE ANKLE SYSTEM. IN THE LAST FOUR YEARS, THE PATIENT HAS ALLEGEDLY BEEN PLAGUED WITH INFECTIONS AT THE SURGICAL SITE IN THE RIGHT ANKLE. THE PATIENT IS SCHEDULED FOR REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18322867 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices
- Vantage 350-22-03Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls2 reports
- Vantage 350-21-04Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- INFINITY 33630023Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER60 reports
- INFINITY 33600020Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall9 reports
- Vantage 350-22-02Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer1 recall5 reports
- INFINITY 33650003Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER55 reports
- INFINITY 33630022Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER54 reports
- INFINITY 33600030Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall4 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page