INFINITY™ EVERLAST™ 33681106Recalls & reported problems
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of INFINITY EVERLAST (20)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889797074353), received between Dec 20, 2022 and Jan 23, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Osseointegration Problem2
Patient problems
- Implant Pain3
- Inadequate Osseointegration2
- Discomfort1
- Fluid Discharge1
- Joint Impingement1
- Swelling/ Edema1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 23, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PAIN AND IMPLANT SUBSIDENCE.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 21215851 ↗InjuryDec 30, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
AS REPORTED: "STUDY: STRYKER ITAR-2 SUBJECT: (B)(6)." DURING 2Y FOLLOW-UP VISIT ON (B)(6) 2024, SUBJECT REPORTED INCREASING PAIN AND SWELLING TO THE INSIDE ASPECT OF THE LEFT ANKLE. MUSCULOSKELETAL EXAM INDICATED DIFFUSE TENDERNESS TO THE MEDIAL REGION OF THE LEFT ANKLE AND SIGNIFICANT DISCOMFORT TO THE MEDIAL GUTTER. IMAGING RESULTS SHOWED A STABLE APPEARING LEFT TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT WITH NO LUCENCY AROUND THE HARDWARE. POSSIBLE IMPINGEMENT OF THE MEDIAL GUTTER WAS NOTED. SUBJECT WILL CONTINUE TO FOLLOW-UP WITH SURGEON AND IF PAIN CONTINUES THE PATIENT COULD REQUIRE MEDIAL GUTTER DEBRIDEMENT OR POSSIBLY A SPECT CT SCAN. SUBJECT WAS PRESCRIBED MELOXICAM FOR PAIN.
Patient problems: Discomfort; Implant Pain; Joint Impingement; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 21035636 ↗InjuryAug 26, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A DEVICE EXPLANT SURGERY DUE TO PATIENT HAVING PAIN AND POSSIBLE LOOSENING. THE PLAN IS TO EITHER FUSE OR REVISE WITH INVISION INBONE SYSTEM.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 20071910 ↗InjuryDec 20, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT AS JUST UNDER 2 WEEKS OUT FROM TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT WITH MEDIAL MALL SCREW. THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR ROUTINE POSTOP VISIT ON (B)(6) 2022. IT WAS NOTED UPON WOUND INSPECTION THAT THERE WAS SOME DRAINAGE FROM THE MEDIAL WOUND. UPON PALPATION THERE WAS A FRANK PURULENCE. BECAUSE OF THIS, INDICATED FOR I&D. AN MRI SHOWED SOME POSSIBLE CONNECTION OF THE FLUID MEDIALLY ALONG WITH OUT OF THE ANTERIOR TIBIA ALONG THE SIDE OF THE IMPLANT. THE PATIENT HAS BEEN ON IV ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY WITH ROCEPHIN AND DAPTOMYCIN. THE PATIENT IS KEEPING THE FOOL ELEVATED, HAS BEEN NON-WEIGHT BEARING IN A SPLINT AND TAKING A BABY ASPIRIN TWICE DAILY FOR DVT PROPHYLAXIS. THE PAIN IS WELL CONTROLLED AND THE INFECTION IS IMPROVING.
Patient problems: Fluid Discharge; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 16019210 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices
- Vantage 350-22-03Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls2 reports
- Vantage 350-21-04Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- INFINITY 33630023Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER60 reports
- INFINITY 33600020Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall9 reports
- Vantage 350-22-02Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer1 recall5 reports
- INFINITY 33650003Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER55 reports
- INFINITY 33630022Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER54 reports
- INFINITY 33600030Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall4 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page