Skip to content

INBONE™ EVERLAST™ 22022208Recalls & reported problems

Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889797074865), received between Nov 4, 2024 and Feb 18, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Biocompatibility” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 2 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Biocompatibility1
  • Naturally Worn1
  • Positioning Failure1

Patient problems

  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Discomfort1
  • Fever1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • Unspecified Infection1
  • Wound Dehiscence1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 18, 2025Biocompatibility; Biocompatibility

    THE PATIENT REPORTED EXPERIENCING A SEVERE ALLERGIC REACTION AND INFECTION RELATED TO THE METAL COMPONENTS IN A STRYKER PRODUCT. THEY ALSO ALLEGE CHRONIC FOOT PAIN CAUSED BY THE IMPLANTS AND HAVE REQUESTED AN ANKLE AMPUTATION, STATING THEY DO NOT BELIEVE THEY ARE A SUITABLE CANDIDATE FOR AN ANKLE PROSTHESIS. POSTOPERATIVELY, THE PATIENT¿S PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN EXAMINED THE ANKLE AND NOTED SIGNS CONSISTENT WITH INFECTION. THE PATIENT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS. DURING A FOLLOW-UP WITH THE SURGEON, THEY WERE ADVISED TO USE NUMBER TWO COMPRESSION SOCKS. THE PATIENT IS CURRENTLY SEEKING ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OPINIONS REGARDING NEXT STEPS AND HAS MENTIONED IDENTIFYING A SURGEON WHO MAY BE ABLE TO PERFORM THE ANKLE AMPUTATION.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Discomfort; Fever; Implant Pain; Unspecified Infection; Wound Dehiscence; Wound Odor

    MAUDE report 21400425 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 5, 2024Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN INBONE TAR REVISION SURGERY, THE SELECTED REPLACEMENT POLY DID NOT FIT THE INSERTION DEVICE , DESPITE BEING UNDAMAGED AND UNUSED. A SECOND POLY WAS OPENED, FIT PROPERLY, AND WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED. THE INCIDENT CAUSED AN APPROXIMATE 10-MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY, WITH NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20605939 ↗
  • InjuryNov 4, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TOTAL ANKLE REVISION SURGERY. THE POLY THAT WAS REMOVED HAD POSTERIOR WEAR ON IT. THE TIBIAL AND TALAR COMPONENTS WERE INTACT SO THEY WERE NOT REPLACED. THE NEW POLY THAT WAS OPENED WOULD NOT FIT INTO THE INSERTER. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO FIT IT INTO BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT INSERTERS TO MAKE SURE IT WASN'T AN ISSUE WITH THE POLY INSERTER ITSELF, BUT IT WOULD NOT SLIDE INTO EITHER. ANOTHER POLY OF THE SAME SIZE WAS OPENED, AND IT FIT IN THE INSERTER.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20605268 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page