INFINITY™ 33680021 (UDI 00889797101516)Recalls & reported problems
Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of INFINITY (51)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 11
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889797101516), received between Sep 2, 2021 and Jul 21, 2026 — classified as 11 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
- Break3
- Fracture3
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Migration2
- Osseointegration Problem2
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Loss of Osseointegration1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant3
- Implant Pain3
- Inadequate Osseointegration3
- Cyst(s)2
- Insufficient Information2
- Pain2
- Arthritis1
- Joint Dislocation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 21, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY FOR REASONS THAT ARE NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT. PLAN IS TO REVISE TIBIA (IF NEEDED) AND TALUS FOR CERTAIN.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25897294 ↗InjuryJul 14, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
SUBJECT: (B)(6). STUDY: STRYKER ITAR-2 - INFINITY WITH ADAPTIS. PROGRESSIVE PERIPROSTHETIC CYSTS. LARGE TALAR CYST ADJACENT TO TALAR IMPLANT ON THE RIGHT ANKLE. REVISION SURGERY WITH POLYETHYLENE COMPONENT REMOVAL PARFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026.
Patient problems: Cyst(s)
MAUDE report 25810895 ↗InjuryNov 17, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
SUBJECT: (B)(6). INFINITY¿ WITH ADAPTIS¿ TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT FOLLOW-UP (ITAR2). (B)(6) 2024: PATIENT IMPROVING 4 WEEKS POST OP AND SITE IS HEALING. (B)(6) 2024: MOST RECENT UPDATE STATES PATIENT REPORTS PAIN IS WORSENING. ( PI #3).
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 23576064 ↗InjuryNov 17, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
SUBJECT: (B)(6). INFINITY¿ WITH ADAPTIS¿ TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT FOLLOW-UP (ITAR2). 30-OCT-2023: PATIENT REPORTED PAIN WAS WORSENING. AE UPGRADED TO SAE AND PATIENT SCHEDULED FOR BONE GRAFT FIXATION OF THE CALCANEUS ON THE LEFT FOOT. (PI #2) 25-JAN-2024: UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION FOR ARTHROTOMY OF ANKLE JOINT WITH DEBRIDEMENT OF ARTHRITIS TO REMOVE LOOSE BODY LATERAL GUTTER, LEFT; PARTIAL EXCISION DISTAL FIBULA FOR DECOMPRESSION; MEDIAL DISPLACEMENT CALCANEAL OSTEOTOMY (SEE ATTACHED OPERATIVE NOTES). (PI #2)
Patient problems: Arthritis; Pain
MAUDE report 23575939 ↗InjuryJan 23, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PAIN AND IMPLANT SUBSIDENCE.
Patient problems: Implant Pain; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 21215856 ↗InjurySep 10, 2024Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN AND MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO BROKEN PEGS IN THE TALAR DOME.
Patient problems: Implant Pain
MAUDE report 20185090 ↗InjuryFeb 29, 2024Break; Fracture; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Break; Fracture; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Osseointegration Problem; Migration
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO POSSIBLE FRACTURE OF THE POSTERIOR TIBIA PEG AND/OR TALAR PEGS.
Patient problems: Cyst(s); Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 18813303 ↗InjuryFeb 22, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT MAY REQUIRE A REMOVAL SURGERY OF THE CURRENT TALAR IMPLANT DUE TO EARLY COLLAPSE OF THE TIBIAL SIDE WITHOUT TRAUMA. THERE IS A FRACTURE PRESENT IN THE TIBIA. THE PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WILL NEED INTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION.
Patient problems: Limb Fracture
MAUDE report 18764013 ↗InjuryDec 28, 2023Loss of Osseointegration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loss of Osseointegration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE DIGITAL STRYKER PROPHECY TEAM RECEIVED A CT SCAN INDICATING THAT THE PATIENT REQUIRE A REVISION SURGERY OF THE TIBIAL AND TALAR COMPONENTS. THE SURGERY WON'T BE DONE UNTIL AT LEAST FEBRUARY.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18414207 ↗InjuryOct 7, 2022Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED AND DURING REVISION IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PEGS WERE BROKEN OFF OF THE ADAPTIS TALAR DOME AND THE DOME ITSELF WAS LOOSE FROM THE TALUS. DOME AND PEGS WERE EXPLANTED (DOME EASILY, PEGS WERE ALL FUSED) AND A NEW SIZE 1 FLAT CUT ADAPTIS TALAR DOME WAS IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 15563111 ↗InjurySep 2, 2021Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROSTHESIS APPEARS TO HAVE SUBSIDED ANTERIORLY. PATIENT STATES THAT SHE HAS SORENESS AT THE MEDIAL AND LATERAL ASPECT OF HER RIGHT ANKLE. SHE NOTES THAT SHE HAS CUT BACK ON FORMAL PT, ATTENDING ONCE WEEKLY DUE TO SORENESS. SHE NOTES HER CONCERNS ABOUT OVERWORKING HER ANKLE. PATIENT NOTES THAT SHE ONLY BEGAN AGGRESSIVE EXERCISES THE LAST 2 TO 4 TIMES SHE HAS LAST BEEN AT PT. PRIOR TO SURGICAL TREATMENT PATIENT NOTES STIFFNESS AND LIMITED ROM OF HER ANKLE. HOWEVER, SHE NOTES IMPROVEMENT OF ANKLE ROM.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Implant Pain; Loss of Range of Motion
MAUDE report 12418138 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices
- Vantage 350-22-03Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls2 reports
- Vantage 350-21-04Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- INFINITY 33630023Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER60 reports
- INFINITY 33600020Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall9 reports
- Vantage 350-22-02Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Ankle, Semi-Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer1 recall5 reports
- INFINITY 33650003Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER55 reports
- INFINITY 33630022Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER54 reports
- INFINITY 33600030Wright Medical Technology, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER1 recall4 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page