Porges Coloplast AA6108Recalls & reported problems
Coloplast A/S · FOLYSIL® catheter pediatric with introducer CH FR 08 · Class 2
All models of Porges Coloplast (79)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 12
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03600040126974), received between Apr 7, 2016 and Mar 20, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (3 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Dec 2, 2024Class IIOpen, Classified
A possible sterility issue was detected in Coloplast's facility on some Coloplast products.
Z-0844-2025 · Root cause: Packaging · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Remove3
- Burst Container or Vessel2
- Deflation Problem2
- Delivered as Unsterile Product2
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Slipped1
- Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- No Information2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Inflammation1
- Pain1
- Urinary Tract Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 20, 2026Nonstandard Device
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION A MANUFACTURING DEFECT HAS BEEN DETECTED IN COLOPLAST PEDIATRIC URINARY CATHETERS BEFORE USE. THE GUIDE WIRE PROTRUDES FROM THE TIP OF THE CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24654810 ↗MalfunctionApr 25, 2025Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, THE NURSE EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE AND DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE CATHETER FROM THE PATIENT. UPON REMOVAL IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE BALLOON HAD FOLDED BACK ON ITSELF. THIS WAS AN ISOLATED INCIDENT, RESULTING IN INCREASED PAIN FOR THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 21910667 ↗MalfunctionApr 22, 2025Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, THE BALLOON OF A PEDIATRIC CATHETER EXPLODED (BURST) AFTER FILLING WITH 2 ML OF LIQUID.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21885317 ↗InjuryJan 23, 2025Delivered as Unsterile Product; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Delivered as Unsterile Product; Insufficient Device Problem Information
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, A PARENT CALLED TO REPORT HER CHILD HAD DEVELOPED A URINARY TRACT INFECTION THAT REQUIRED MEDICAL INTERVENTION AFTER USING ITEM AA6108.
Patient problems: Urinary Tract Infection
MAUDE report 21223593 ↗MalfunctionMar 28, 2024Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION THE BALLOON BURST DURING USE. NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18994842 ↗MalfunctionJan 5, 2024Delivered as Unsterile Product; Delivered as Unsterile Product
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION AN EYELASH WAS WELDED INTO THE INNER STERILE PACKAGING. NO DEFICITS FOR PATIENT OR PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18453986 ↗MalfunctionAug 3, 2022Deflation Problem; Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse; Difficult to Remove; Deflation Problem; Difficult to Fold, Unfold or Collapse; Difficult to Remove
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, IN A NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT, A NURSE WANTED TO REMOVE THE URINARY CATHETER FROM A NEW BORN. AFTER DEFLATION OF THE BALLOON, THE NURSE FELT RESISTANCE DURING EXTRACTION OF THE LAST 0.5 CENTIMETERS; THE CATHETER SEEMED IMPOSSIBLE TO REMOVE. THE CATHETER WAS INTRODUCED AGAIN, LUBRICATED, THEN EXTRACTED WITH SUCCESS, BUT WITH FORCE. THE CATHETER WAS TESTED ONCE AFTER REMOVING IT; THE BALLOON CORRECTLY INFLATED BUT DID NOT FOLD CORRECTLY DURING DEFLATION, TAKING THE ASPECT OF A "RING". THERE WAS NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCE FOR THE NEWBORN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15156306 ↗InjuryJan 5, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, THE SURGEON PLACED A BLADDER STENT WITHOUT ANY NOTICEABLE ISSUES DURING AN APPENDECTOMY OF A YOUNG PATIENT. POST OPERATIVELY, THE STENT WAS LEFT IN PLACE. FIFTEEN MINUTES AFTER THE PATIENT ARRIVED IN THE RECOVERY ROOM, THE SURGEON WAS CALLED BACK BECAUSE THE STENT WAS NO LONGER IN PLACE. THE STENT WAS "CUT IN HALF" AND THE DISTAL END REMAINED IN THE BLADDER. THE PATIENT WAS PLACED UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA AND A CYSTOSCOPY WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE DISTAL END. THERE WERE NO SUBSEQUENT CONSEQUENCES. THE BALLOON HAD NOT BEEN INFLATED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. NO SHARP OBJECTS HAD BEEN USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT PROBING MANDREL IN PLACE, THERE WAS GREATER RESISTANCE THAN USUAL WHEN WITHDRAWING THE MANDREL. IT WAS PROBABLE SHEAR INJURY AT THIS TIME; SPONTANEOUS RUPTURE OF THE PROBE OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES LATER.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 11120494 ↗MalfunctionJul 3, 2019Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, CATHETER LAID IN PATIENT´S DIAPERS - BALLOON LOOKS DAMAGED. IT IS UNCLEAR IF THE TIP IS DAMAGED OR MISSING.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 8761190 ↗InjuryMay 30, 2019Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, UNBLOCKING, ASPIRATED WITH 2 ML (MORE WAS NOT POSSIBLE, 3X CONTROLLED) THEN REMOVED, THIS WAS EASILY POSSIBLE, THEN A SHORT "ZAPPING" COULD BE HEARD, THE CATHETER WAS TORN IN THE PATIENT AND HAD TO BE REMOVED SURGICALLY.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 8655137 ↗MalfunctionJun 30, 2017Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, AT THE TIME OF WITHDRAWAL OF THE CATHETER (48 HOURS AFTER HAVING PLACED IT IN THE PATIENTS' BODY), THE DEFLATION OF BALLOON WAS PERFORMED BUT THE CATHETER REMAINED BLOCKED IN THE URETHRAL MEATUS. ACCORDING TO THE NURSE, IT SEEMED LIKE THE BALLOON WAS NOT ENOUGH DEFLATED. THE CATHETER HAD TO BE PULLED TO BE WITHDRAWN, AN INFLAMMATION OF THE PENIS WAS REPORTED. DID THEY TRIED TO INFLATE/DEFLATE THE BALLOON ? - YES SEVERAL TIMES. THE BALLOON WAS EMPTY ? YES, IT WAS THICK BUT NO MORE FLUID IN THE BALLOON.
Patient problems: Inflammation
MAUDE report 6681622 ↗MalfunctionApr 7, 2016Hole In Material; Device Slipped
ACCORDING TO THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, CATHETER HAS BEEN INSERTED TO A PEDIATRIC PATIENT IN EMERGENCY UNIT BECAUSE OF URINARY RETENTION. PATIENT WAS THEN TRANSFERRED TO PEDIATRIC WARD, WHERE THE CATHETER HAD COME OUT BY ITSELF THE NEXT MORNING. CATHETER'S BALLOON WAS TESTED AND IT WAS FOUND OUT THAT THE FLUID DOESN'T STAY INSIDE THE BALLOON, AND THAT THERE WAS A HOLE ON THE CATHETER'S BALLOON FLUID CANAL.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 5555815 ↗
Other CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON devices
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON512 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175816C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON476 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® I.C. All-Silicone Foley Catheter 1758SI16C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON1 death383 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON234 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Temp Sensing Foley Catheter 119216MC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON167 reports
- Bardex® Lubri-Sil® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 175814C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON153 reports
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165812C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON151 reports
- SureStep™ Foley Tray System Bard® Lubri-Sil® Foley Catheter Tray A942216C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, RETENTION TYPE, BALLOON2 recalls46 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page