Skip to content

Medicrea|UNiD OCT B33243699-01Recalls & reported problems

Medicrea International · UNID EXP B33243699-01 DUAL 3.5/6.0 CC · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03613720290018), received between Mar 1, 2025 and May 12, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 12, 2026Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING INTRAOPERATIVE REVISION PROCEDURE FOR PROXIMAL JUNCTIONAL KYPHOSIS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE UNID ROD WAS BEING PLACED INTO THE TULIP HEADS, THE ROD SNAPPED AND SHEARED AT THE 6.0 DIAMETER PORTION. THE ROD WAS TAKEN OUT AND REPLACED WITH A NEW ROD, AND NO FRAGMENT REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25148734 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 11, 2026Fracture

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT, POSTOPERATIVE X-RAYS FOR PATIENT CLINIC VISIT ON (B)(6) 2025 WERE MEASURED AND NOTICED THE ROD FRACTURES DURING MEASUREMENT PROTOCOLS. LEVELS IMPLANTED WERE C2-S2A1. PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION. IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THERE WERE ANY COMPLICATIONS OR ADDITIONAL HOSPITALIZATION OR SURGERY AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24567570 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 1, 2025Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY FOR CERVICAL DEFORMITY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT, ROD BROKE AT TRANSITION POINT WHEN SURGEON TRIED TO ADD MORE LORDOSIS TO THE CERVICAL PORTION OF ROD. THERE WERE NO BROKEN FRAGMENTS OF THE ROD LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT BODY. THE PROCEDURE OR TECHNIQUE PERFORMED WAS ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL TREATMENT OR SURGERY PERFORMED AS A RESULT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21500880 ↗

Other Posterior cervical screw system devices

All Posterior cervical screw system devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page