ROI-C MC1433PRecalls & reported problems
LDR Spine Usa, Inc. · ROI-C Lordotic Implant 14x17H7 · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03662663016483), received between Oct 13, 2020 and Nov 19, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Crack1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 19, 2024Crack; Crack
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ACDF SURGERY AFTER THE CERVICAL CAGE WAS INSERTED, A CRACK WAS NOTED IN THE UPPER PORTION OF THE IMPLANT. FOLLOWING SURGICAL GUIDE THE SURGEON DRILLED OFF AREAS FOR REMOVAL. THE IMPLANT WAS EFFECTIVELY DESTROYED DURING REMOVAL AND THE PIECES WERE RETRIEVED AND DISCARDED. A NEW IMPLANT OF THE SAME SIZE WAS THEN PLACED WITH ONLY A 20 MINUTE DELAY. THE PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20729614 ↗MalfunctionOct 13, 2020Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE AT THE C7/T1 LEVEL THE ANCHORING PLATE WAS DIFFICULT TO INSERT THE SECOND PLATE. THE CAGE WAS FOUND TO BE FRACTURED, THE PLATE AND CAGE WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ALTERNATES OF THE SAME SIZE. AT THE C6/C7 LEVEL THE FIRST ANCHORING PLATE WAS HINDERED BY THE SUPERIOR ENDPLATE OF C7 AND WHEN THE SURGEON IMPACTED TO INSERT THE PLATE AND CAGE BROKE. AT THE C6 LEVEL THE ANCHORING PLATE WAS DIFFICULT TO INSERT AND BOTH THE CAGE AND ANCHORING PLATE BROKE. THEY WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ALTERNATES. THE SURGEON OPTED TO NOT USE ANCHORING PLATES AT C6 AND C7 LEVELS. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT IMPACTS.THIS IS REPORT ONE OF SIX FOR THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10674747 ↗
Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Cervical devices
- NA 03.617.902Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical103 reports
- NA 03.617.900Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical77 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626525Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical75 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626526Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical49 reports
- NA 03.617.905Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical29 reports
- NA 03.617.904Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical27 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626746Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical21 reports
- NA 03.647.972Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical17 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page