Skip to content

ROI-C MC1433PRecalls & reported problems

LDR Spine Usa, Inc. · ROI-C Lordotic Implant 14x17H7 · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03662663016483), received between Oct 13, 2020 and Nov 19, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Crack1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 19, 2024Crack; Crack

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ACDF SURGERY AFTER THE CERVICAL CAGE WAS INSERTED, A CRACK WAS NOTED IN THE UPPER PORTION OF THE IMPLANT. FOLLOWING SURGICAL GUIDE THE SURGEON DRILLED OFF AREAS FOR REMOVAL. THE IMPLANT WAS EFFECTIVELY DESTROYED DURING REMOVAL AND THE PIECES WERE RETRIEVED AND DISCARDED. A NEW IMPLANT OF THE SAME SIZE WAS THEN PLACED WITH ONLY A 20 MINUTE DELAY. THE PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20729614 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 13, 2020Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE AT THE C7/T1 LEVEL THE ANCHORING PLATE WAS DIFFICULT TO INSERT THE SECOND PLATE. THE CAGE WAS FOUND TO BE FRACTURED, THE PLATE AND CAGE WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ALTERNATES OF THE SAME SIZE. AT THE C6/C7 LEVEL THE FIRST ANCHORING PLATE WAS HINDERED BY THE SUPERIOR ENDPLATE OF C7 AND WHEN THE SURGEON IMPACTED TO INSERT THE PLATE AND CAGE BROKE. AT THE C6 LEVEL THE ANCHORING PLATE WAS DIFFICULT TO INSERT AND BOTH THE CAGE AND ANCHORING PLATE BROKE. THEY WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ALTERNATES. THE SURGEON OPTED TO NOT USE ANCHORING PLATES AT C6 AND C7 LEVELS. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT IMPACTS.THIS IS REPORT ONE OF SIX FOR THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10674747 ↗

Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Cervical devices

All Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Cervical devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page