Skip to content

Sentus ProMRI OTW QP L-85/49 408719Recalls & reported problems

BIOTRONIK SE & Co. KG · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Biotronik Sentus ProMRI pacemaker lead is a wire that carries signals between a pacemaker and the left side of the heart. Many of the 1,374 reports describe the lead moving out of position, high electrical resistance or the heart not being reliably stimulated, and some mention leads removed after making the diaphragm contract. The reports include 7 deaths, 501 injuries and 866 malfunctions. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
1,385
Deaths reported
7
Injuries reported
510
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1,385 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04035479148959), received between Dec 19, 2017 and Sep 29, 2026 — classified as 7 deaths, 510 injuries, 868 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (468 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 15 reportsDec 2023: 9 reportsJan 2024: 21 reportsFeb 2024: 10 reportsMar 2024: 15 reportsApr 2024: 18 reportsMay 2024: 12 reportsJun 2024: 15 reportsJul 2024: 13 reportsAug 2024: 20 reportsSep 2024: 21 reportsOct 2024: 12 reportsNov 2024: 16 reportsDec 2024: 12 reportsJan 2025: 26 reportsFeb 2025: 12 reportsMar 2025: 23 reportsApr 2025: 13 reportsMay 2025: 18 reportsJun 2025: 17 reportsJul 2025: 17 reportsAug 2025: 20 reportsSep 2025: 13 reportsOct 2025: 16 reportsNov 2025: 18 reportsDec 2025: 17 reportsJan 2026: 27 reportsFeb 2026: 17 reportsMar 2026: 22 reportsApr 2026: 15 reportsMay 2026: 12 reportsJun 2026: 4 reportsJul 2026: 2 reportsAug 2026: 14 reportsSep 2026: 18 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202627
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated468
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem410
  • High impedance205
  • Failure to Capture182
  • Ambient Noise Problem140
  • Fracture108
  • High Capture Threshold51
  • Extracardiac stimulation43

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions698
  • Unspecified Infection327
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient173
  • Undesired Nerve Stimulation75
  • Twiddlers Syndrome31
  • Muscle Stimulation20
  • Pocket Erosion20
  • Bacteremia11

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 1,385 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 29, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    Patient problems: Twiddlers Syndrome

    MAUDE report 50940803 ↗
  • InjurySep 29, 2026High Capture Threshold

    This LV lead was capped due to high thresholds. No adverse patient events were reported. Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50933057 ↗
  • InjurySep 29, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50926840 ↗
  • InjurySep 29, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50926786 ↗
  • InjurySep 25, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    System was explanted due to infection. Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50899792 ↗
  • InjurySep 25, 2026Extracardiac stimulation; High Capture Threshold

    The LV lead was explanted due to high threshold and phrenic nerve stim. Should additional information be received this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: Undesired Nerve Stimulation

    MAUDE report 50899159 ↗
  • InjurySep 25, 2026Malposition of Device

    Lead was capped due to sub-optimal position. No adverse patient events were reported. Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50896828 ↗
  • InjurySep 24, 2026Failure to Capture; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    This LV lead was explanted due to dislodgement resulting in failure to capture. Should additional information be received this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50886521 ↗
  • InjurySep 23, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    This lead was explanted, same day as implant, due to dislodgement. Should additional information become available, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50870680 ↗
  • InjurySep 23, 2026Fracture; High impedance

    This lead was explanted due to Impedances greater than 3000 ohms, possibly due to a lead fracture. No adverse patient events were reported. Should additional information become available, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50870618 ↗
  • InjurySep 16, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    System was explanted due to infection. Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50787337 ↗
  • InjurySep 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    System was explanted due to infection. Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50734838 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 11, 2026Ambient Noise Problem

    Possible lead noise on LV lead. No adverse patient events were reported. Device currently remains implanted. Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50734420 ↗
  • InjurySep 9, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    This lead was explanted due to dislodgement. Should additional information become available, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50692328 ↗
  • InjurySep 4, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50615321 ↗
  • InjurySep 3, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50599385 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 2, 2026Intermittent Capture; Ambient Noise Problem; Impedance Problem

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50569490 ↗
  • InjurySep 2, 2026High impedance; Extracardiac stimulation; High Capture Threshold

    This lead was explanted due to high threshold, high impedance, and diaphragm stim. Should additional information be received this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: Undesired Nerve Stimulation

    MAUDE report 50565559 ↗
  • InjuryAug 31, 2026Break

    This LV lead broke after tug test during device changeout and IS4 pin remained in ICD. Lead was cut and capped. No adverse patient events were reported. Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50530983 ↗
  • InjuryAug 31, 2026Failure to Capture; Extracardiac stimulation

    This lead was explanted due to no capture and diaphragmatic stimulation. No adverse patient events were reported. Should additional information become available, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: Undesired Nerve Stimulation

    MAUDE report 50530849 ↗
  • InjuryAug 26, 2026Failure to Capture; High impedance; Malposition of Device

    This LV lead had impedance of 3000 on all poles and no capture. Upon opening the pocket, the lead was found to be bent at a severe angle coming out of the LV port. The pocket was enlarged to allow the lead to lay in a straighter position and remains implanted. No adverse patient events were reported. Should additional information be received this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50456373 ↗
  • InjuryAug 19, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    This system was explanted due to infection. Should additional information become available, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50333036 ↗
  • InjuryAug 19, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    This lead was explanted due to dislodgement. Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50331026 ↗
  • InjuryAug 17, 2026Unstable Capture Threshold

    This lead was explanted due to the phrenic nerve stimulation and threshold was very near the capture threshold. Should additional information become available, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: Undesired Nerve Stimulation

    MAUDE report 50284561 ↗
  • InjuryAug 13, 2026High impedance

    This lead was explanted due to high impedance. No adverse patient events were reported. Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50241247 ↗

Other Drug eluting permanent left ventricular (lv) pacemaker electrode devices

All Drug eluting permanent left ventricular (lv) pacemaker electrode devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page