Olympus A22041TRecalls & reported problems
OLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Resection sheath, 24 Fr., with deflecting obturator · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 12
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04042761020978), received between Jan 16, 2019 and May 11, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 10 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (11 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Nov 11, 2025Open, Classified
Complaints of the ceramic tip of the resection sheath breaking have been received.
Z-1442-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break11
- Fracture3
- Material Fragmentation3
- Mechanical Problem3
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
- Foreign Body In Patient2
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 11, 2026Break; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THE RESECTION SHEATH WAS IN USE AND A DAMAGE HAD OCCURRED DURING A TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION, THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE. A FRAGMENT FELL OFF WHILE THE ELECTRODE WAS BEING MANIPULATED INSIDE THE BLADDER. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INJURY OR HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25137119 ↗MalfunctionApr 28, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CERAMIC TIP OF THE SHEATH WAS BROKEN. THE ISSUE WAS FOUND DURING SET UP FOR AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE. NO HARM REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25017061 ↗MalfunctionApr 23, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THE ENDOSCOPE SHEATH EXHIBITED A BROKEN CERAMIC TIP. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING REPROCESSING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24967802 ↗MalfunctionAug 26, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE¿SUBJECT DEVICE HAD BROKEN CERAMIC TIP. THE ISSUE WAS FOUND DURING INSPECTION FOR USE THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22893543 ↗MalfunctionAug 4, 2025Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THE RESECTION SHEATH TIP BROKE OFF WHEN BOX WAS OPENED. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22704656 ↗InjuryApr 22, 2022Break; Break
OLYMPUS WAS NOTIFIED OF THE EVENT FROM THE CUSTOMER VIA MW5107602. DURING A CYSTOSCOPY TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE, THE TIP OF THE SWIVEL OBTURATOR ON THE SCOPE BROKE OFF IN THE PATIENT. THE BROKEN TIP WAS RETRIEVED AND NO PIECES WERE LEFT IN THE PATIENT. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THIS MALFUNCTION OCCURRED AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO PROCEDURAL DELAY, NO CHANGE IN THE PATIENT'S TREATMENT COURSE DUE TO THE MALFUNCTION AND NO POST-OPERATIVE ISSUES WITH THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS ISSUE. THE CUSTOMER REQUESTED A RE-EDUCATION ON THE PROPER HANDLING OF THIS DEVICE AND THERE HAVE NOT BEEN ANY FURTHER ISSUES SINCE TRAINING.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 14190520 ↗InjuryApr 22, 2022Break
OLYMPUS WAS NOTIFIED OF THE EVENT FROM THE CUSTOMER VIA MW5107602. DURING A CYSTOSCOPY TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE, THE TIP OF THE SWIVEL OBTURATOR ON THE SCOPE BROKE OFF IN THE PATIENT. THE BROKEN TIP WAS RETRIEVED AND NO PIECES WERE LEFT IN THE PATIENT. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THIS MALFUNCTION OCCURRED AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO PROCEDURAL DELAY, NO CHANGE IN THE PATIENT'S TREATMENT COURSE DUE TO THE MALFUNCTION AND NO POST-OPERATIVE ISSUES WITH THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS ISSUE. THE CUSTOMER REQUESTED A RE-EDUCATION ON THE PROPER HANDLING OF THIS DEVICE AND THERE HAVE NOT BEEN ANY FURTHER ISSUES SINCE TRAINING.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 14190477 ↗MalfunctionSep 20, 2021Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem
OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A THERAPEUTIC TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION PROCEDURE IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE CERAMIC INSULATION AT THE DISTAL END OF THE RESECTION SHEATH WAS MISSING. THE MISSING FRAGMENT COULD NOT BE LOCATED AND IT IS UNCLEAR WHETHER IT WAS ALREADY MISSING DURING THE PRE-USE INSPECTION OR WHETHER THE FRAGMENT BROKE OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER SIMILAR DEVICE AND THERE WAS NO REPORT ABOUT AN ADVERSE EVENT OR PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12493931 ↗MalfunctionAug 31, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE TERRITORY SALES MANAGER OBTAINED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM THE PHYSICIAN WHO REPORTED THE EVENT WAS OBSERVED AT THE END OF A TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF A BLADDER TUMOR PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS PROLONGED BY 15 MINUTES.AS A SINGLE PIECE FELL OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WAS RETRIEVED USING A CYSTOSCOPE AND A BASKET. THE PATIENT WAS INSPECTED AND CONFIRMED NO INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12397234 ↗MalfunctionApr 19, 2021Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem
OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE CERAMIC INSULATION AT THE DISTAL END OF THE RESECTION SHEATH WAS MISSING. IT COULD NOT BE CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINED WHETHER THE FRAGMENT HAD FALLEN INTO THE PATIENT DURING THE PROCEDURE AND THE MISSING FRAGMENT COULD NOT BE LOCATED. HOWEVER, THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SAME SET OF EQUIPMENT AND THERE WAS NO REPORT ABOUT AN ADVERSE EVENT OR PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11684275 ↗MalfunctionMar 7, 2019Break; Break
OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL TIP OF THE DEVICE PARTIALLY BROKE OFF INTO MULTIPLE PIECES INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BLADDER. THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THEY WERE UNABLE TO RETRIEVE ALL THE DEVICE FRAGMENTS, HOWEVER, THERE AS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8401441 ↗MalfunctionJan 16, 2019Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Mechanical Problem
OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A THERAPEUTIC TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION (TUR) PROCEDURE, THE CERAMIC INSULATION AT THE DISTAL END OF THE RESECTION SHEATH BROKE OFF AND FELL INTO THE PATIENT¿S BLADDER. THE FRAGMENT WAS REDUCED TO SMALL PIECES USING A LASER AND RETRIEVED AFTERWARDS. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE AND THERE WAS NO REPORT ABOUT AN ADVERSE EVENT OR PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8251871 ↗
Other Resectoscope devices
- Olympus A22040AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Resectoscope1 recall1,764 reports
- Olympus A42011AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Resectoscope1 recall963 reports
- Olympus A22041AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Resectoscope1 recall656 reports
- Olympus A22042AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Resectoscope1 recall55 reports
- Olmypus WA22017AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Resectoscope1 recall31 reports
- Olympus A22040TOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Resectoscope1 recall23 reports
- Olympus A22014AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Resectoscope1 recall11 reports
- Olympus A22043AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Resectoscope1 recall3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page