Olympus WA60120ARecalls & reported problems
OLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Handle "HiQ+", inline A, asymmetric, ratchet · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04042761031066), received between May 6, 2019 and Sep 8, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Code Available1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 8, 2026Fracture; Detachment of Device or Device Component
During an unspecified procedure, the jaw of the needle holder broke and fell into the patient's abdomen. The device part was retrieved with no reports of further patient harm.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50665635 ↗InjurySep 4, 2019Break; Break
THE SERVICE CENTER WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC PARAESOPHAGEAL HERNIA REPAIR PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE NEEDLE DRIVER BROKE OFF INTO THE PATIENT¿S STOMACH. THE DOCTOR WAS ABLE TO LOCATE AND RETRIEVE THE DEVICE FRAGMENT BY NAVIGATING THROUGH THE PATIENT¿S PELVIS USING X-RAY (FLUOROSCOPY). THE INCIDENT LED TO AN INCREASED EXPOSURE TO ANESTHESIA. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE. THE PATIENT WAS NOT KEPT FOR OBSERVATION. THERE WAS NO LONG TERM AFFECT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8961228 ↗MalfunctionMay 6, 2019Break; Break
OLYMPUS WAS INFORMED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY, THE DOCTOR WAS INSERTING THE DEVICE INTO THE PATIENT'S ABDOMINAL CAVITY WHEN THE SURGEON NOTICED THE DISTAL PART OF THE "NEEDLE" BROKE OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE SURGEON WAS NOT ABLE TO LOCATE THE DISTAL PART OF THE DEVICE IN THE PATIENT'S ABDOMINAL CAVITY. THE RESULTS OF THE PATIENT'S X-RAY DID NOT SHOW EVIDENCE OF ANY DEVICE FRAGMENTS INSIDE THE PATIENT'S ABDOMINAL CAVITY. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO POST SURGERY COMPLICATIONS OR INJURIES REPORTED BY THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8583075 ↗
Other Mediastinoscope, Surgical devices
- Olympus WA64700AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Mediastinoscope, Surgical10 reports
- Olympus WA64710AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Mediastinoscope, Surgical7 reports
- NA 10973HDKarl Storz GmbH & Co. KG · Mediastinoscope, surgical5 reports
- Olympus WA52050AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Mediastinoscope, Surgical1 report
- Olmypus WA63728AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Mediastinoscope, Surgical1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page