Skip to content

Olympus WA64360CRecalls & reported problems

OLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04042761068611), received between Aug 25, 2023 and Aug 27, 2026 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 2 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 2 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Defective Component1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Output Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions7

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 27, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    It was reported that the reusable Rigid endoscopic tissue manipulation forceps exhibited the tip is coming off. The malfunction was identified during reprocessing. There were no reports of patient inolvement.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50477209 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 6, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC COLECYSTECTOMY THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE, A BURN-RELATED DAMAGE OCCURRED ON THE INSULATION SECTION AT THE TIP OF THE JAWS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING THE SAME EQUIPMENT CONTINUOUSLY. THERE WERE NO DELAYS IN THE PROCEDURE TIME. THERE WERE NO SERIOUS INJURIES OR ADVERSE EVENTS TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25093944 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 6, 2026Break

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC COLECYSTECTOMY THERAPEUTIC PROCEDURE, A BURN-RELATED DAMAGE OCCURRED ON THE INSULATION SECTION AT THE TIP OF THE JAWS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING THE SAME EQUIPMENT CONTINUOUSLY. THERE WERE NO DELAYS IN THE PROCEDURE TIME. THERE WERE NO SERIOUS INJURIES OR ADVERSE EVENTS TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25093927 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS OBSERVED THAT DURING THE DEVICE EVALUATION, THE HAND INSTRUMENT JAW EXHIBITED THE WELDING OF THE CLAMP CORE WAS LOOSE AND DETACHED. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18859837 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2024Loose or Intermittent Connection; Output Problem; Loose or Intermittent Connection; Output Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED, THE ROOT OF THE JAWS WAS LOOSE, AND SPARKS APPEARED WHEN OUTPUT. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SAME SET OF EQUIPMENT. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18788600 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 20, 2024Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED, THE FORCEPS DISTAL END WAS CRACKED/CHIPPED. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING REPROCESSING. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18741186 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 25, 2023Defective Component; Defective Component

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT WHEN USING A JAWS "HIQ+", BIPOLAR, 5 X 330 MM, DISSECTION FORCEPS, THE FORCEPS WAS BROKEN, AND THE INSULATION WAS INCOMPLETE. THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING PREPARATION FOR USE. THE THERAPEUTIC LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PROCEDURAL DELAY, OR NO PATIENT HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17625027 ↗

Other Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery devices

All Laparoscope, General & Plastic Surgery devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page