Skip to content

n.a. 27071ZJRecalls & reported problems

Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG · Biopsy Forceps, 28 cm · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04048551079133), received between Feb 9, 2022 and Aug 12, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 2 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Fragmentation3
  • Break1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • Laceration(s)2
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 12, 2024Material Fragmentation; Use of Device Problem; Material Fragmentation; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FORCEPS BROKE WHILE PERFORMING A STONE REM. AFTER THE BREAKAGE THE FORCEPS COULD NO LONGER BE CLOSED AND THEREFORE COULD NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE BLADDER. THE CYSTOSCOPY HAD TO BE CONVERTED TO A LAPAROTOMY TO REMOVE THE BROKEN FORCEPS FROM THE BLADDER.

    Patient problems: Laceration(s)

    MAUDE report 19962753 ↗
  • InjuryAug 12, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FORCEPS BROKE WHILE PERFORMING A STONE REM. AFTER THE BREAKAGE THE FORCEPS COULD NO LONGER BE CLOSED AND THEREFORE COULD NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE BLADDER. THE CYSTOSCOPY HAD TO BE CONVERTED TO A LAPAROTOMY TO REMOVE THE BROKEN FORCEPS FROM THE BLADDER.

    Patient problems: Laceration(s)

    MAUDE report 19962724 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 9, 2022Break; Material Fragmentation; Material Twisted/Bent; Break; Material Fragmentation; Material Twisted/Bent

    AS PER A MANUFACTURER INCIDENT REPORT WE RECEIVED FROM THE FACTORY IN (B)(4): USER REPORTED THAT THE BIOPSY FORCEPS BROKE DURING SURGERY. THE CASE WAS A REMOVAL OF DJ STENT. 3FR GRASPER WAS REQUESTED BUT 3FR BIOPSY WAS OPENED. FUNCTIONAL CHECK WAS DONE BEFORE USING. IT BROKE AFTER INSERTION WHEN IT DID NOT HOLD ONTO ANYTHING YET. FLUSHED AND X-RAY DONE, HOWEVER, NO BROKEN PARTS WERE DETECTED. THERE COULD BE A POTENTIAL RISK OF A FOREIGN BODY LEFT IN THE PATIENT, BUT AT THIS POINT THERE IS NO INFORMATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN AN IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. SO, THERE IS NOT YET ENOUGH INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO CLASSIFY THE HEALTH IMPACT OR IF ANY OCCURRED. (MFR'S. INTERNAL COMPLAINT # (B)(4)).

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13497820 ↗

Other Endoscopic grasping/cutting instrument, non-powered devices

All Endoscopic grasping/cutting instrument, non-powered devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page