CLICKLINE 33400Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04048551142707), received between Apr 20, 2018 and Mar 30, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryMar 30, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY ON THE SIGMOID COLON, THE SURGEON NOTICED A MALFUNCTION IN THE JOHANNE MULTI-PURPOSE GRASPING FORCEPS, RESULTING IN THE DETACHMENT OF A SMALL METAL FRAGMENT INTO THE ABDOMEN. THE FRAGMENT WAS IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFIED AND RETRIEVED WITHOUT CAUSING ANY HARM TO THE PATIENT. AN ABDOMINAL X-RAY WAS PERFORMED TO RULE OUT THE PRESENCE OF OTHER FRAGMENTS, WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE INSTRUMENT WAS FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY AT THE START OF THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS SUBMITTED TO ADDITIONAL X-RAY CHECK-UP NOT FORESEEN, WITH EXTENSION OF SURGICAL PROCEDURE. SINCE THE ADDITIONAL X RAY WAS REQUIRED, THIS CASE IS REPORTABLE.

  Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

  MAUDE report 24708750 ↗
• InjuryMar 30, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY ON THE SIGMOID COLON, THE SURGEON NOTICED A MALFUNCTION IN THE JOHANNE MULTI-PURPOSE GRASPING FORCEPS, RESULTING IN THE DETACHMENT OF A SMALL METAL FRAGMENT INTO THE ABDOMEN. THE FRAGMENT WAS IMMEDIATELY IDENTIFIED AND RETRIEVED WITHOUT CAUSING ANY HARM TO THE PATIENT. AN ABDOMINAL X-RAY WAS PERFORMED TO RULE OUT THE PRESENCE OF OTHER FRAGMENTS, WITH NEGATIVE RESULTS. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE INSTRUMENT WAS FUNCTIONING CORRECTLY AT THE START OF THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS SUBMITTED TO ADDITIONAL X-RAY CHECK-UP NOT FORESEEN, WITH EXTENSION OF SURGICAL PROCEDURE. SINCE THE ADDITIONAL X RAY WAS REQUIRED, THIS CASE IS REPORTABLE.

  Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

  MAUDE report 24708749 ↗
• MalfunctionDec 23, 2025Break; Chemical Problem; Break; Chemical Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE IS BROKEN/JAMMED. NO NEGATIVE IMPACT IN STATE OF HEALTH REPORTED. CROSS REFERENCE MDR: 9610617-2025-02419.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 23879089 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 11, 2019Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

  ALLEGEDLY, THE INSULATION ON THE SHAFT OF THE INSTRUMENT FELL OFF IN THE PATIENT DURING A PROCEDURE. THEY WERE ABLE TO RETRIEVE ALL PIECES AND IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT.

  Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

  MAUDE report 8505531 ↗
• MalfunctionApr 20, 2018Material Separation; Material Separation

  ALLEGEDLY, DURING A ROBOTIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PROCEDURE, PIECES OF INSULATION CAME OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE DOCTOR USED ANOTHER INSTRUMENT AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE WITH NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT. HOSPITAL REPORTED THAT THE INSULATION PIECES WERE RECOVERED AND THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 7449118 ↗