CLICKLINE 33410ONRecalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04048551143285), received between Feb 18, 2025 and Feb 18, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryFeb 18, 2025Break; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Sharp Edges; Break; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Sharp Edges

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ATRAUMATIC GRASPER CREATED A TEAR/HOLE ON THE STOMACH, AND IT WAS NOT BEING PULLED ON. THE SURGEON SAID THAT SHE WOULD HAVE NEEDED TO SUTURE THE HOLES, HAD THAT PART OF THE STOMACH REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. FORTUNATELY, IT WAS THE PART OF THE STOMACH THAT WAS REMOVED FROM THE BODY. THE SURGEON MENTIONED THAT IT HAPPENED IN ANOTHER CASE A WEEK OR TWO AGO. CROSS REFERENCE MDR: 9610617-2025-00241.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Perforation

  MAUDE report 21398760 ↗
• InjuryFeb 18, 2025Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Use of Device Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ATRAUMATIC GRASPER CREATED A TEAR/HOLE ON THE STOMACH, AND IT WAS NOT BEING PULLED ON. THE SURGEON SAID THAT SHE WOULD HAVE NEEDED TO SUTURE THE HOLES, HAD THAT PART OF THE STOMACH REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. FORTUNATELY, IT WAS THE PART OF THE STOMACH THAT WAS REMOVED FROM THE BODY. THE SURGEON MENTIONED THAT IT HAPPENED IN ANOTHER CASE A WEEK OR TWO AGO. CROSS REFERENCE MDR 9610617-2025-00242.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Perforation

  MAUDE report 21396032 ↗
• InjuryFeb 18, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ATRAUMATIC GRASPER CREATED A TEAR/HOLE ON THE STOMACH, AND IT WAS NOT BEING PULLED ON. THE SURGEON SAID THAT SHE WOULD HAVE NEEDED TO SUTURE THE HOLES, HAD THAT PART OF THE STOMACH REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. FORTUNATELY, IT WAS THE PART OF THE STOMACH THAT WAS REMOVED FROM THE BODY. THE SURGEON MENTIONED THAT IT HAPPENED IN ANOTHER CASE A WEEK OR TWO AGO. CROSS REFERENCE MDR 9610617-2025-00241.

  Patient problems: Perforation

  MAUDE report 21393856 ↗
• InjuryFeb 18, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ATRAUMATIC GRASPER CREATED A TEAR/HOLE ON THE STOMACH, AND IT WAS NOT BEING PULLED ON. THE SURGEON SAID THAT SHE WOULD HAVE NEEDED TO SUTURE THE HOLES, HAD THAT PART OF THE STOMACH REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. FORTUNATELY, IT WAS THE PART OF THE STOMACH THAT WAS REMOVED FROM THE BODY. THE SURGEON MENTIONED THAT IT HAPPENED IN ANOTHER CASE A WEEK OR TWO AGO. CROSS REFERENCE MDR 9610617-2025-00242.

  Patient problems: Perforation

  MAUDE report 21393593 ↗