Skip to content

CLICKLINE 34310MS-DRecalls & reported problems

Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG · CLICKLINE Scissors Insert · Class 2

All models of CLICKLINE (46)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04048551336410), received between Oct 3, 2019 and Apr 25, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 2 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Fragmentation2
  • Break1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Material Separation1
  • Mechanical Jam1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 25, 2024Break; Material Fragmentation; Use of Device Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Material Fragmentation; Use of Device Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY, BILATERAL SALPINGO-OOPHORECTOMY, AND SENTINEL LYMPH NODE STAGING ON (B)(6) 2023. THE PROCEDURE WAS UNEVENTFUL. HOWEVER, DURING A SURVEILLANCE VISIT WITH THE ONCOLOGIST IN MARCH 2024, THE PATIENT NOTED PERSISTENT RIGHT SIDED PELVIC DISCOMFORT SINCE HER (B)(6) 2023 SURGERY. THE PATIENT THEN HAD AN MRI ON (B)(6) 2024, AND A 3MM METALLIC OBJECT WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE LEFT PELVIS. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECURRENT DISEASE. PATIENT THEN UNDERWENT PROCEDURE TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENT ON (B)(6) 2024. THE REMOVED FRAGMENT WAS EXAMINED UNDER DISSECTION SCOPE AND APPEARS CONSISTENT WITH SURGICAL SCISSORS THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN USED DURING LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE BACK IN (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19186678 ↗
  • InjuryApr 25, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY, BILATERAL SALPINGO-OOPHORECTOMY, AND SENTINEL LYMPH NODE STAGING ON (B)(6) 2023. THE PROCEDURE WAS UNEVENTFUL. HOWEVER, DURING A SURVEILLANCE VISIT WITH THE ONCOLOGIST IN (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT NOTED PERSISTENT RIGHT SIDED PELVIC DISCOMFORT SINCE HER (B)(6) 2023 SURGERY. THE PATIENT THEN HAD AN MRI ON (B)(6) 2024, AND A 3MM METALLIC OBJECT WAS IDENTIFIED IN THE LEFT PELVIS. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF RECURRENT DISEASE. PATIENT THEN UNDERWENT PROCEDURE TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENT ON (B)(6) 2024. THE REMOVED FRAGMENT WAS EXAMINED UNDER DISSECTION SCOPE AND APPEARS CONSISTENT WITH SURGICAL SCISSORS THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN USED DURING LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE BACK IN (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19186670 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 2, 2020Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam

    AS PER A VIGILANCE REPORT FILED WITH NATIONAL COMPETENT AUTHORITY, SWISSMEDIC, BY THE FACTORY IN (B)(6): DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE, THE JAWS OF THE CLICKLINE SCISSORS INSERT COULD NO LONGER BE CLOSED INTRA-ABDOMINALLY. TO REMOVE THE INSTRUMENT, THE TROCAR HAD TO BE REMOVED AND A PAIR OF PLIERS WAS USED TO CLOSE THE JAWS IN ORDER TO BRING THE SCISSORS INSERT THROUGH THE ORIFICE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9777546 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 3, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation

    AS PER A VIGILANCE REPORT FILED BY OUR PARENT COMPANY IN (B)(4): BLACK PARTICLE WAS FOUND IN PATIENT DURING SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 9154077 ↗

Other Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices

All Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page