Skip to content

n.a. 27050G-SRecalls & reported problems

Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG · ELECTRODE,CUTTING,STERILE.24FR · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04048551394540), received between Aug 24, 2017 and Oct 21, 2025 — classified as 9 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (8 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation8
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Energy Output Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient6
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 21, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LOOP BROKE OFF DURING THE CASE AND NEEDED TO BE RETRIEVED VIA GRASPERS. NO NEGATIVE IMPACT IN STATE OF HEALTH REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23350624 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 24, 2022Energy Output Problem; Material Separation; Energy Output Problem; Material Separation

    THE MANUFACTURER'S COMPLAINT REFERENCE NUMBER FOR THIS CASE IS (B)(4) WHICH REPORTS ALL INCIDENTS IN ONE CASE. THREE RELATED COMPLAINTS TO THIS EVENT (B)(4), (B)(4) AND (B)(4). IN A CASE ON (B)(6) 2022 WITH DR. (B)(6), PER THE STAFF IN THE ROOM, 4 LOOPS OUT OF THE SAME BOX BROKE RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE LOOP EVERY TIME (THIS WAS TRUE FOR ALL OF THEM). NO HARM REPORTED TO PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15477677 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 19, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation

    ALLEGEDLY PER THE CUSTOMER, DURING A TURP THE DOCTOR NOTICED AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE THAT THE LOOP BROKE IN HALF AND PER THE SURGEON NOTHING FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT, AND WITH NO ILL EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10872506 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 10, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation

    AS PER AN AER FROM (B)(6) RECEIVED BY THE FACTORY IN (B)(4): BROKE INSIDE THE UTERUS. EXTENSION OF THE INTERVENTION FOR RECOVERY OF THE BROKEN PART.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10140857 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation

    ALLEGEDLY PER THE CUSTOMER, DURING A TURP THE DOCTOR NOTICED A PIECE OF THE WIRE FROM THE LOOP ARCHED AND FELL OFF IN THE PATIENT. THE DOCTOR REMOVED THE BROKEN PIECE BY "FLUSHING THE FRAGMENT OUT" PER THE NURSE, WITH NO ILL EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT. THE ELECTRODE WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9285317 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 12, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation

    ALLEGEDLY, THE ELECTRODE BROKE DURING THE PROCEDURE AND FELL INTO THE PATIENT. THEY WERE ABLE TO RETRIEVE BROKEN PIECE AND HOSPITAL REPORTED THERE WAS NO HARM TO PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6946957 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 30, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation

    ALLEGEDLY, THE DOCTOR WAS PERFORMING A TURP WHEN THE LOOP BROKE OFF INTO THE PATIENT. THE DOCTOR IMMEDIATELY RETRIEVED, REPLACED INSTRUMENT AND COMPLETED PROCEDURE. THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6831508 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 30, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation

    ALLEGEDLY, THE DOCTOR WAS PERFORMING A TURP WHEN THE LOOP BROKE OFF INTO THE PATIENT. THE DOCTOR IMMEDIATELY RETRIEVED, REPLACED INSTRUMENT AND COMPLETED PROCEDURE. THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6831504 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 24, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation

    ALLEGEDLY, DURING A CYSTOSCOPY PROCEDURE THE DOCTOR NOTED THAT A PIECE OF THE LOOP BROKE DURING THE PROCEDURE AND FELL INTO THE PATIENT'S BLADDER. THE INSTRUMENT WAS REPLACED AND THE PIECE WAS IMMEDIATELY REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO DELAY AND THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6819103 ↗

Other HYSTEROSCOPE (AND ACCESSORIES) devices

All HYSTEROSCOPE (AND ACCESSORIES) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page