n.a. 27050G-SRecalls & reported problems
Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG · ELECTRODE,CUTTING,STERILE.24FR · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04048551394540), received between Aug 24, 2017 and Oct 21, 2025 — classified as 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (8 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation8
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Energy Output Problem1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient6
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 21, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LOOP BROKE OFF DURING THE CASE AND NEEDED TO BE RETRIEVED VIA GRASPERS. NO NEGATIVE IMPACT IN STATE OF HEALTH REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23350624 ↗MalfunctionSep 24, 2022Energy Output Problem; Material Separation; Energy Output Problem; Material Separation
THE MANUFACTURER'S COMPLAINT REFERENCE NUMBER FOR THIS CASE IS (B)(4) WHICH REPORTS ALL INCIDENTS IN ONE CASE. THREE RELATED COMPLAINTS TO THIS EVENT (B)(4), (B)(4) AND (B)(4). IN A CASE ON (B)(6) 2022 WITH DR. (B)(6), PER THE STAFF IN THE ROOM, 4 LOOPS OUT OF THE SAME BOX BROKE RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE LOOP EVERY TIME (THIS WAS TRUE FOR ALL OF THEM). NO HARM REPORTED TO PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15477677 ↗MalfunctionNov 19, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation
ALLEGEDLY PER THE CUSTOMER, DURING A TURP THE DOCTOR NOTICED AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE THAT THE LOOP BROKE IN HALF AND PER THE SURGEON NOTHING FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT, AND WITH NO ILL EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10872506 ↗MalfunctionJun 10, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation
AS PER AN AER FROM (B)(6) RECEIVED BY THE FACTORY IN (B)(4): BROKE INSIDE THE UTERUS. EXTENSION OF THE INTERVENTION FOR RECOVERY OF THE BROKEN PART.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10140857 ↗MalfunctionNov 6, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation
ALLEGEDLY PER THE CUSTOMER, DURING A TURP THE DOCTOR NOTICED A PIECE OF THE WIRE FROM THE LOOP ARCHED AND FELL OFF IN THE PATIENT. THE DOCTOR REMOVED THE BROKEN PIECE BY "FLUSHING THE FRAGMENT OUT" PER THE NURSE, WITH NO ILL EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT. THE ELECTRODE WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9285317 ↗MalfunctionOct 12, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation
ALLEGEDLY, THE ELECTRODE BROKE DURING THE PROCEDURE AND FELL INTO THE PATIENT. THEY WERE ABLE TO RETRIEVE BROKEN PIECE AND HOSPITAL REPORTED THERE WAS NO HARM TO PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6946957 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation
ALLEGEDLY, THE DOCTOR WAS PERFORMING A TURP WHEN THE LOOP BROKE OFF INTO THE PATIENT. THE DOCTOR IMMEDIATELY RETRIEVED, REPLACED INSTRUMENT AND COMPLETED PROCEDURE. THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6831508 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation
ALLEGEDLY, THE DOCTOR WAS PERFORMING A TURP WHEN THE LOOP BROKE OFF INTO THE PATIENT. THE DOCTOR IMMEDIATELY RETRIEVED, REPLACED INSTRUMENT AND COMPLETED PROCEDURE. THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6831504 ↗MalfunctionAug 24, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation
ALLEGEDLY, DURING A CYSTOSCOPY PROCEDURE THE DOCTOR NOTED THAT A PIECE OF THE LOOP BROKE DURING THE PROCEDURE AND FELL INTO THE PATIENT'S BLADDER. THE INSTRUMENT WAS REPLACED AND THE PIECE WAS IMMEDIATELY REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO DELAY AND THE HOSPITAL REPORTED THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6819103 ↗
Other HYSTEROSCOPE (AND ACCESSORIES) devices
- Olympus WA2T430AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Hysteroscope (And Accessories)783 reports
- Olympus WA2T412AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Hysteroscope (And Accessories)453 reports
- Olympus A22001AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Hysteroscope (And Accessories)366 reports
- Olympus WA2T470AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Hysteroscope (And Accessories)323 reports
- Olympus A22002AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Hysteroscope (And Accessories)297 reports
- Olympus A22003AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Hysteroscope (And Accessories)198 reports
- n.a. 27040XAKarl Storz GmbH & Co. KG · HYSTEROSCOPE (AND ACCESSORIES)102 reports
- Myosure Reach Tissue Removal Device 10-401FCHologic, Inc. · HYSTEROSCOPE (AND ACCESSORIES)4 deaths99 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page