Skip to content

n.a. 021199-10Recalls & reported problems

Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG · Valve Seal · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04048551400227), received between Apr 13, 2026 and Apr 13, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 2 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Output Problem2
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 13, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component; Output Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE VALVES OF THE TROCARS BROKE DURING THEIR FIRST USE THE HANDLE PRESENTED EXCESSIVE RESISTANCE WHEN OPENING/CLOSING AND WHEN ROTATING THE KNOB, THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS OF PERFORMING SURGERY ON A NEWBORN PATIENT WHEN THE PRODUCTS MENTION FAILED. AS REPORTED PATIENT IS IN THE USUAL CONDITION EXPECTED AFTER SURGERY OF THIS TYPE (THERE IS NO WORSENED CONDITION DUE TO THE EQUIPMENT FAILURE). DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE VALVES OF THE TROCARS BROKE DURING THEIR FIRST USE, APPROXIMATELY HALFWAY THROUGH THE SURGERY. AS A CONSEQUENCE, THE SURGICAL TEAM REPEATEDLY LOST PNEUMOTHORAX, WHICH CAUSED RESPIRATORY COMPLICATIONS AND JEOPARDISED THE CONTINUATION OF THE PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE HOSPITAL, THE INSTRUMENTS INSERTED WERE COMPATIBLE AND WERE HANDLED WITH CARE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MONOPOLAR CABLE SUPPLIED IN THE SAME ORDER DID NOT FUNCTION. THE MEDICAL TEAM CONFIRMED THAT THE ISSUE WAS CAUSED BY THE CABLE ITSELF, AS WHEN REPLACED WITH ANOTHER STORZ CABLE AVAILABLE AT THE HOSPITAL, THE SYSTEM WORKED CORRECTLY. ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE HANDLE, WHICH WAS BEING USED FOR THE SECOND TIME. THE CLINICIANS REPORTED THAT THE HANDLE PRESENTED EXCESSIVE RESISTANCE WHEN

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24853507 ↗
  • InjuryApr 13, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component; Output Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE VALVES OF THE TROCARS BROKE DURING THEIR FIRST USE THE HANDLE PRESENTED EXCESSIVE RESISTANCE WHEN OPENING/CLOSING AND WHEN ROTATING THE KNOB, THEY WERE IN THE PROCESS OF PERFORMING SURGERY ON A NEWBORN PATIENT WHEN THE PRODUCTS MENTION FAILED. AS REPORTED PATIENT IS IN THE USUAL CONDITION EXPECTED AFTER SURGERY OF THIS TYPE (THERE IS NO WORSENED CONDITION DUE TO THE EQUIPMENT FAILURE). DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE VALVES OF THE TROCARS BROKE DURING THEIR FIRST USE, APPROXIMATELY HALFWAY THROUGH THE SURGERY. AS A CONSEQUENCE, THE SURGICAL TEAM REPEATEDLY LOST PNEUMOTHORAX, WHICH CAUSED RESPIRATORY COMPLICATIONS AND JEOPARDISED THE CONTINUATION OF THE PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE HOSPITAL, THE INSTRUMENTS INSERTED WERE COMPATIBLE AND WERE HANDLED WITH CARE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MONOPOLAR CABLE SUPPLIED IN THE SAME ORDER DID NOT FUNCTION. THE MEDICAL TEAM CONFIRMED THAT THE ISSUE WAS CAUSED BY THE CABLE ITSELF, AS WHEN REPLACED WITH ANOTHER STORZ CABLE AVAILABLE AT THE HOSPITAL, THE SYSTEM WORKED CORRECTLY. ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE HANDLE, WHICH WAS BEING USED FOR THE SECOND TIME. THE CLINICIANS REPORTED THAT THE HANDLE PRESENTED EXCESSIVE RESISTANCE WHEN

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24853485 ↗

Other Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices

All Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page