Skip to content

PANOVIEW PLUS HD 892103254Recalls & reported problems

Richard Wolf GmbH · DISCOSCOPE 25° Ø 6.9MM SL 165MM rigid, with lateral ocular lens, working channel Ø 4.1mm, irrigation channel Ø 1.3mm, TL 279mm, rod lens system · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04055207035078), received between Jul 14, 2022 and Jul 14, 2022 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Optical Obstruction” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Optical Obstruction2

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 14, 2022Optical Obstruction; Optical Obstruction

    RWMIC REFERENCE COMPLAINT NO. (B)(4). IT WAS REPORTED TO RICHARD WOLF MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. (RWMIC) THAT "THIS T&E (TRIAL & EVALUATION) SCOPE WAS IN USE AT LONE PEAK SURGERY CENTER LOCATED IN DRAPER, UT. THE SCOPE WHEN DARK DURING A TWO-LEVEL INTERLAMINAR PROCEDURE. ONE LEVEL WAS COMPLETED AND ONE LEVEL WAS NOT COMPLETED." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REPORTED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: WILL THE DEVICE BE RETURNED? YES. WAS THE DEVICE BEING USED ON A PATIENT WHEN THE REPORTING ISSUE OCCURRED? YES. WAS THERE ANY INJURY OR ILLNESS TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED ISSUE? NO. WAS THERE ANY INJURY OR ILLNESS TO ANY OTHER PERSONNEL DUE TO THE REPORTED ISSUE? NO. DID THE ISSUE CAUSE A DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED? YES. DID THE DELAY PUT THE PATIENT AT RISK? YES. WAS THERE A SIMILAR BACK-UP DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR USE? NO. WAS THE SCHEDULED PROCEDURE COMPLETED? NO. ADDITIONAL DETAILS ABOUT THE ADVERSE EVENT; (B)(6) 2022. THERE IS NO REPORT OF INJURY TO THE PATIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSONNEL AS A RESULT OF THE REPORTED ISSUE. THERE WAS A REPORT OF A DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE THAT PUT THE PATIENT AT RISK. THERE WAS NO BACK-UP DEVICE AVAILABLE AND THE SCHEDULED PROCEDURE WAS ABORTED RESULTING I

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15018040 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 14, 2022Optical Obstruction; Optical Obstruction

    RICHARD WOLF MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. (RWMIC) REFERENCE COMPLAINT (B)(4). IT WAS REPORTED TO RICHARD WOLF MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. (RWMIC) THAT "THIS T&E (TRIAL & EVALUATION) SCOPE WAS IN USE AT LONE PEAK SURGERY CENTER LOCATED IN DRAPER, UT. THE SCOPE WHEN DARK DURING A TWO-LEVEL INTERLAMINAR PROCEDURE. ONE LEVEL WAS COMPLETED AND ONE LEVEL WAS NOT COMPLETED." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REPORTED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: WILL THE DEVICE BE RETURNED? YES. WAS THE DEVICE BEING USED ON A PATIENT WHEN THE REPORTING ISSUE OCCURRED? YES. WAS THERE ANY INJURY OR ILLNESS TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED ISSUE? NO. WAS THERE ANY INJURY OR ILLNESS TO ANY OTHER PERSONNEL DUE TO THE REPORTED ISSUE? NO. DID THE ISSUE CAUSE A DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED? YES. DID THE DELAY PUT THE PATIENT AT RISK? YES. WAS THERE A SIMILAR BACK-UP DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR USE? NO. WAS THE SCHEDULED PROCEDURE COMPLETED? NO. ADDITIONAL DETAILS ABOUT THE ADVERSE EVENT; 06-JULY-2022. THERE IS NO REPORT OF INJURY TO THE PATIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSONNEL AS A RESULT OF THE REPORTED ISSUE. THERE WAS A REPORT OF A DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE THAT PUT THE PATIENT AT RISK. THERE WAS NO BACK-UP DEVICE AVAILABLE AND THE SCHED

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15017887 ↗

Other Arthroscope devices

All Arthroscope devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page