ERAGON MODULAR 8394258Recalls & reported problems
Richard Wolf GmbH · DEBAKEY FORCEPS-INSERT Ø 5MM jaw length 47mm, for SL 450mm, double action · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04055207056059), received between May 20, 2021 and May 20, 2021 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 20, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
RW MIC RECEIVED A RESPONSE FROM THE USER FACILITY WITH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: PROCEDURE: ROBOTIC LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION AND CREATION OF DIVERTING LOOP ILEOSTOMY, FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY. DEVICE FAILURE HAPPENED WHILE THE INSTRUMENT WAS BEING USED INTRAOPERATIVELY. THIS WAS AFTER THE PATIENT WAS ASLEEP AND INSUFFLATION WAS COMPLETE. THIS WAS A ROBOTIC CASE SO WE WERE USING TROCHARS, SCOPE, ELECTROCAUTERY GENERATOR AND CAMERA. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO RICHARD WOLF AND A VISUAL INSPECTION WAS COMPLETED. THE INVESTIGATION FOUND THAT ONE SIDE OF THE FORK, WHICH ENCLOSES THE HINGES, IS BROKEN OFF AND IS NOT PRESENT. ALSO MISSING ARE AT LEAST TWO CONNECTING PINS AND TWO GUIDE PINS. IT SEEMS THAT A LOT OF LATERAL FORCE WAS APPLIED TO THE JAWS, WHICH CAUSED THE FORK TO BREAK. THESE ARE RELATIVELY LONG JAWS, AND THIS LEVERAGE CAN CREATE A LOT OF INTERNAL STRAIN. CARE MUST BE TAKEN NOT TO OVERLOAD THE DELICATE COMPONENTS. THE ROOT CAUSE WAS ATTRIBUTED TO HUMAN ERROR. THE DEVICE WAS SCRAPPED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11855436 ↗
Other Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices
- HIGH DEFINITION LCD MONITOR OEV262HOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,937 reports
- HD AUTOCLAVABLE CAMERA HEAD OTV-S7ProH-HD-12EOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,886 reports
- HD AUTOCLAVABLE CAMERA HEAD OTV-S7ProH-HD-10EOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,086 reports
- Auto Suture OMS-T10BTCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1 recall955 reports
- PDB OMS-PDB1000Covidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery859 reports
- VISERA 4K UHD CAMERA CONTROL UNIT OLYMPUS OTV-S400Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery777 reports
- Auto Suture OMS-T10SBCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1 recall697 reports
- Spacemaker SMBTTRNDXCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery590 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page