Skip to content

BIXCUT 0227-6105Recalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · IM Reamer, mod. Trinkle Fitting · Class 1

All models of BIXCUT (34)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540145857), received between Feb 21, 2019 and Dec 21, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Fracture3
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 21, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE REAMER WAS BENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23861060 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 6, 2023Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN IM FLEXIBLE REAMER WAS BROKEN DURING SURGERY WHICH RESULTED IN A 20 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY. THERE WAS NO DEBRIS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16484382 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 27, 2022Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT IM REAMERS BROKE DURING USE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15113555 ↗
  • InjuryJul 29, 2021Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED VIA MEDWATCH (MW5101338) THAT MULTIPLE GRADUATED SIZED REAMERS ARE NEEDED TO PREPARE THE INTRAMEDULLARY CANAL FOR RECEIVING AN ORTHOPEDIC ROD OR NAIL. DURING A PROCEDURE TO REPAIR A LEFT COMMINUTED FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURE, WHILE REAMING FOR THE INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL, THE FLEXIBLE REAMER BROKE IN THE FEMORAL CANAL. THE REAMER WAS TOO FLEXIBLE AND WOULD NOT ROTATE NOR COULD BE MALLETED OUT. THE SURGEON NEEDED TO TAKE AN ALTERNATE APPROACH FOR RETRIEVAL. THERE WAS AN INCREASED LENGTH OF TIME IN THE OPERATING ROOM IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE. THE SURGEON INDICATED APPROXIMATELY 45 MINUTES. THE PATIENT, DUE TO THIS EVENT, DID RECEIVE MORE ANESTHESIA BUT FROM A CLINICAL STANDPOINT WAS HEMODYNAMICALLY STABLE. THE BROKEN PART OF THE REAMER WAS SAFELY RETRIEVED FROM THE SURGICAL SITE. A NEW SET OF SURGICAL REAMERS WAS OBTAINED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A SECOND ENTRY SITE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12248671 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 21, 2019Break; Fracture; Fracture

    THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT DURING THE CASE THE 10.5 FLEXIBLE REAMER WAS USED AND THE TIP BROKE OFF LEAVING A PIECE IN THE FEMORAL CANAL. ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO REMOVE THE PIECE BUT WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED AS THE PIECE WAS SUFFICIENTLY FAR DOWN THE CANAL THAT THE IMPLANT COULD STILL BE PLACED OVER THE TOP. THE SURGEON STATED THAT THE DEVICE IS NOT CANNULATED AND, AS A RESULT, IT IS MORE DIFFICULT TO REMOVE THE ITEM IF IT BREAKS BECAUSE OF THIS DESIGN FEATURE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8359063 ↗

Other Orthopedic Manual Surgical Instrument devices

All Orthopedic Manual Surgical Instrument devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page