Skip to content

NA 1806-0353Recalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Extraction Rod, Conical · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540196446), received between Dec 10, 2018 and Feb 4, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 4, 2025Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture

    AS REPORTED: "EXTRACTION ROD IS BROKEN OFF AT THE FRONT"

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21306908 ↗
  • InjuryMay 6, 2021Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    AS REPORTED: "THE CUSTOMER CALLED THE SALES REP DURING SURGERY AND COMPLAINED THAT NONE OF THE INSTRUMENTS ON THE METAL EXTRACTION FIT THE PROXIMAL HUMERAL NAIL. ACCORDING TO THE DOCTOR, HE HAD ALREADY REMOVED THE TRANSVERSE SCREWS, BUT NEITHER THE EXTRACTION ROD NOR THE 6MM CONICAL ADAPTER WOULD GRAB THE PROXIMAL END OF THE NAIL. ALL EFFORTS ON THE PART OF THE SALES REP TO PROVIDE A SATISFACTORY SOLUTION WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. SPECIFICALLY, THE PROBLEM WAS PROBABLY THAT THE ADAPTERS ALWAYS CAME LOOSE WHEN TRYING TO DRIVE THE NAIL OUT. THE SALES REP SUSPECTED THAT THE NAIL WOULD ROTATE WITH IT, SINCE THE TRANSVERSE SCREWS HAD ALREADY BEEN REMOVED - BUT ACCORDING TO THE DOCTOR, THIS WAS NOT THE CASE. THE SALES REP RECEIVED A PICTURE OF THE CONTENTS OF THE ME SET AFTER THE SURGERY - ALL INSTRUMENTS WERE PRESENT." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: PROXIMAL HUMERUS HAD TO BE SPLIT TO LOOSEN THE NAIL. THE SURGERY TOOK 2 HOURS. ACCORDING TO THE DOCTOR, IF THE PROPER INSTRUMENTS WERE PRESENTED, THE PROCEDURE WOULD HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN ABOUT 30 TO 45 MINUTES.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11787190 ↗
  • InjuryDec 10, 2018Break

    CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT WHILST USING THE TIMEX LOAN KIT ¿ THE CONICAL EXTRACTION ROD 6MM (1806-0353) BROKE INSIDE OF THE NAIL DURING REMOVAL. PATIENT BOOKED TO UNDERGO FURTHER SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. REP WAS NOT PRESENT FOR CASE AND WHEN RECEIVED THE CALL REGARDING THE BREAKAGE THE INSTRUMENT HAD ALREADY BEEN THROWN AWAY.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8148412 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page