Skip to content

T2 1806-3305Recalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Proximal Target Adapter · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540379719), received between Nov 12, 2018 and Apr 21, 2021 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Align” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Align2
  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 21, 2021Failure to Align; Failure to Align

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PROXIMAL TARGETING ADAPTER DID NOT TARGET THE SECOND OF TWO PROXIMAL HOLES. IT WAS OKAY FOR THE HOLE PRIOR. THE SURGEON ELECTED NOT TO IMPLANT A SECOND PROXIMAL SCREW. OPERATIVE SIDE IS LEFT AND THERE WAS APPROXIMATELY A 2 MINUTE DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11704191 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 15, 2020Failure to Align; Failure to Align

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE AIMING JIG FOR SHORT LENGTH SUPRACONDYLAR NAILS IS INACCURATE AND AS A CONSEQUENCE MISSING THE NAIL.

    Patient problems: No Information; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9963928 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 12, 2018Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE DISTAL SIDE OF THE PROXIMAL SCREW WAS INSERTED, IT WAS MISSED THE TARGET . THEREFORE, THE SCREW WAS REMOVED AND OPERATION WAS FINISHED. THE DOCTOR'S COMMENT: WHEN DRILLING FOR THE PROXIMAL LATERAL SCREW, SOMETIMES INVOLVED FASCIA, IT MAY BE DUE TO A FAILURE TO DRILL SMOOTHLY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8061877 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page