TwinFix 07-40221Recalls & reported problems
Stryker GmbH · EMERGENCY BLADE FOR CAN. COMPR. SCREWS · Class 1 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04546540388100), received between Aug 16, 2022 and Aug 16, 2022 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 16, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE FOLLOWING ISSUE: "THE PATIENT HAD AN UNCOMPLICATED SCAPHOID NON UNION. AT EXPLORATION THE FRACTURE WAS VISIBLE BUT STABLE. IT JUST REQUIRED A COMPRESSION SCREW ACROSS THE FRACTURE. THE CASE PROCEEDED WITH NO PROBLEMS AND I INSERTED THE GUIDE-WIRE INTO THE OPTIMAL POSITION. THE SCAPHOID WAS DRILLED - AND ¿TAPPED¿ (HE IS YOUNG AND FIT AND SO THE BONE WAS LIKELY TO BE OF ROBUST QUALITY). ON INSERTING THE SCREW, SHORTLY BEFORE IT REACHED ITS OPTIMAL POSITION, THE TOP SUDDENLY ¿STRIPPED¿. IT WAS THEN IMPOSSIBLE TO ADVANCE OR TO REMOVE THE SCREW AND SO IT HAD TO BE LEFT IN A SUBOPTIMAL POSITION, WITHOUT COMPRESSION AND NOT FULLY ACROSS THE FRACTURE SITE. I THEN CLOSELY INSPECTED THE END OF THE SCREWDRIVER, WITH MAGNIFICATION. IT COULD CLEARLY BE SEEN THAT THE HEXAGONAL EDGES WERE WORN AND ROUNDED OFF, WHICH WAS ENTIRELY THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM." UPDATE: "THE SCREW REMOVAL TOOL DOES NOT FIT INTO THE HEAD OF THE SCREW - IT IS TOO BIG. IT HAS NEVER FITTED. THE TOOL CANNOT BE USED. IT IS THE SAME FOR EVERY KIT. THE SCREW COULD NOT BE ADVANCED NOR WITHDRAWN.¿
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15237648 ↗
Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page