Skip to content

NA 1806-6160Recalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Extraction hook, small · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540509994), received between Nov 16, 2018 and Mar 4, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Fracture2
  • Material Deformation2
  • Material Twisted/Bent2
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1
  • Entrapment of Device1
  • Mechanical Jam1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 4, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    AS REPORTED: "THE THREADS ON THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE UNIVERSAL ROD AND THE EXTRACTION HOOK HAVE BECOME DEFORMED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21520624 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 6, 2023Break; Fracture; Mechanical Jam; Break; Fracture; Mechanical Jam

    AS REPORTED: "THE TIP OF THE EXTRACTION HOOK WAS BROKEN OFF DURING EXTRACTION OF THE FRACTURED NAIL AND THE METAL PIECE IS RETAINED IN THE PATIENT BODY." UPDATE- IT WAS ADDITIONALLY REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A 60 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17884969 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 19, 2023Material Deformation; Material Twisted/Bent; Material Deformation; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN EXTRACTING THE BROKEN TIP OF A GAMMA NAIL, AN EXTRACTION HOOK WAS USED, BUT THE TIP BENT AND BECAME UNUSABLE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17151498 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 14, 2023Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture

    AS REPORTED: "DURING AN EXTRACTION OF A T2A-GT NAIL, THE HOOK PART BROKE DURING THE PROCESS AND WAS RETAINED IN THE BODY OF PATIENT."

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 16743072 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 16, 2018Break; Entrapment of Device; Device Damaged by Another Device; Material Twisted/Bent

    AFTER THE PROXIMAL BROKEN NAIL AND LAG SCREW WERE REMOVED, EXTRACTION HOOK (18066160) WAS HANGED TO THE DISTAL PART OF NAIL AND HIT WITH HAMMER AND ABOUT 1MM OF THE TIP OF THE EXTRACTION HOOK WAS LACKED AND THE IT WAS NOT ABLE TO BE HANGED TO NAIL. THEREFORE, NEW HOOK WAS USED, BUT THE TIP OF THE HOOK WAS BENT AFTER IT WAS HIT WITH HAMMER AND NOT ABLE TO BE USED. THEREFORE, THE DISTAL PART OF THE NAIL AND BROKEN HOOK WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT BODY AND OPERATION WAS FINISHED. REMOVAL OF NAIL REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY WAS DONE. HOWEVER, THE DISTAL PART OF THE NAIL WAS NOT REMOVED AND IT WAS LEFT AND CHS IMPLANT (SYNTHES) WAS DEPLOYED. REVISION # 2 REPORTED UNDER SEPARATE PI.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 8081169 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page