VARIAX 62-17333Recalls & reported problems
Stryker GmbH · Screwdriver Blade 1.7mm, Cross-Pin, Dent. · Class 1
All models of VARIAX (345)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540540935), received between Jan 24, 2019 and May 26, 2021 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Missing” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Component Missing1
- Mechanical Jam1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 26, 2021Component Missing; Component Missing
IT HAS BEEN REPORTED THAT WHEN OPENING THE VARIAX HAND KIT NUMBER PLATE TVARXM28 / IVARXM28 IN THE OPERATING ROOM, WITH THE PATIENT ANESTHETIZED, THEY NOTICED THAT THE TWO SCREWDRIVER BLADES (REF:62-17333 AND 62-23333) WERE MISSING FROM THE KIT. FACED WITH THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF PLACING THE PLATE AND SCREWS, THE OPERATING SURGEON WAS FORCED TO SYNTHESIZE THE FRACTURE USING KIRSCHNER WIRES AND SUTURES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11889375 ↗MalfunctionJan 24, 2019Mechanical Jam
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT AS THE SURGEON WAS IMPLANTING A SCREW INTO THE FINGER OF A MALE PATIENT, THE SCREW GOT STUCK IN THE SCREWDRIVER. THE SURGEON TRIED TO TOGGLE THE SCREWDRIVER TO RELEASE THE SCREW BUT THIS ACTION PULLED THE SCREW OUT FROM THE BONE. THE PATIENT HAD OSTEOPOROSIS. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY AS THERE WERE OTHER HOLES IN THE PLATE WHICH COULD BE USED. THERE WERE NO DELAYS TO SURGERY. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THIS SCREWDRIVER HAS LIKELY BEEN ON THE SET FOR NEARLY 10 YEARS AND IS LIKELY TO BE WORN. THE SCREWDRIVER HAS BEEN QUARANTINED FROM USE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8276292 ↗
Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page