Skip to content

VariAx 53-27214SRecalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · BONE SCREW, T7 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of VARIAX (345)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540593870), received between Sep 18, 2015 and Nov 14, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Difficult to Insert2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Implant Pain1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • No Code Available1
  • No Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Skin Inflammation/ Irritation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 14, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IN 2018, THE CLAIMANT HAD AN ORIF AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH UNKNOWN PINS AND A PLATE, AROUND (B)(6) 2021/(B)(6) 2022, SHE FELT SOME DISCOMFORT/IRRITATION AND SOUGHT MEDICAL CARE. THE REVISION WAS SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2022 TO REMOVE THE IMPLANTED DEVICES. DURING THE SURGERY, THE SURGEON DISCOVERED THAT HE DID NOT HAVE THE CORRECT INSTRUMENTS TO REMOVE THE HARDWARE. THE HOSPITAL SPENT SOME TIME TRYING TO FIND A SUITABLE TO ASSIST IN THE REMOVAL, BUT COULD NOT LOCATE A SUITABLE SCREWDRIVER. HOWEVER, ONE SCREW WAS ABLE TO BE REMOVED THROUGH CAREFUL USE OF A SMALLER SCREWDRIVER HEAD. SINCE THE FAILED SURGERY, THE PATIENT HAS BEEN LEFT WITH A RAISED RED RASH ON HER WRIST, AND IS IN MORE PAIN THAN BEFORE THE FAILED SURGERY. ADDITIONALLY, THIS IS AFFECTING HER WRIST MOVEMENT MORE THAT BEFORE THE SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Implant Pain; Loss of Range of Motion; Skin Inflammation/ Irritation

    MAUDE report 18132908 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 29, 2018Difficult to Insert

    THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT WHEN IMPLANTING A DISTAL RADIUS PLATE, TWO 2.7MM SCREWS WERE TWISTING IN THE HOLE AND NOT GETTING PURCHASE. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING 2 NEW 2.3MM SCREWS AND BY DRILLING 2 NEW HOLES ALONG THE OBLONG. THE PATIENT WAS YOUNG AND WITH GOOD BONE. THERE WAS A SHORT DELAY OF A FEW MINUTES WHILE ADDITIONAL HOLES WERE DRILLED AND NEW SCREWS WERE OBTAINED. THE SURGEON WAS SATISFIED WITH THE OUTCOME OF THE CASE.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7383027 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 29, 2018Difficult to Insert; Material Twisted/Bent

    THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT WHEN IMPLANTING A DISTAL RADIUS PLATE, TWO 2.7MM SCREWS WERE TWISTING IN THE HOLE AND NOT GETTING PURCHASE. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED USING 2 NEW 2.3MM SCREWS AND BY DRILLING 2 NEW HOLES ALONG THE OBLONG. THE PATIENT WAS YOUNG AND WITH GOOD BONE. THERE WAS A SHORT DELAY OF A FEW MINUTES WHILE ADDITIONAL HOLES WERE DRILLED AND NEW SCREWS WERE OBTAINED. THE SURGEON WAS SATISFIED WITH THE OUTCOME OF THE CASE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7383022 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 18, 2015Break

    DURING VARIAX DR SURGERY, THE SURGEON DRILLED SCREW HOLE WITH A 2.0MM DRILL BIT. THE SURGEON INSERTED THE CORTICAL SCREW INTO THE PLATE SCREW HOLE. HOWEVER, THE SHAFT OF CORTICAL SCREW BROKE. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE BROKEN SCREW. THE SURGEON DRILLED ANOTHER SCREW HOLE WITH A 2.3MM DRILL BIT. THE SURGEON INSERTED THE LOCKING SCREW IN ANOTHER SCREW HOLE. THE SHAFT OF SCREW BROKE AGAIN. THE SURGEON WAS NOT ABLE TO REMOVE THE SHAFT OF BROKEN SCREW. THE SURGEON IS REQUESTING AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION OF THE BROKEN SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 5088814 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 18, 2015Break

    DURING VARIAX DR SURGERY, THE SURGEON DRILLED SCREW HOLE WITH A 2.0MM DRILL BIT. THE SURGEON INSERTED THE CORTICAL SCREW INTO THE PLATE SCREW HOLE. HOWEVER, THE SHAFT OF CORTICAL SCREW BROKE. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE BROKEN SCREW. THE SURGEON DRILLED ANOTHER SCREW HOLE WITH A 2.3MM DRILL BIT. THE SURGEON INSERTED THE LOCKING SCREW IN ANOTHER SCREW HOLE. THE SHAFT OF SCREW BROKE AGAIN. THE SURGEON WAS NOT ABLE TO REMOVE THE SHAFT OF BROKEN SCREW. THE SURGEON IS REQUESTING AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION OF THE BROKEN SCREWS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 5088774 ↗

Other PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices

All PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page