VARIAX 62-27015Recalls & reported problems
Stryker GmbH · SCREWDRIVER BLADE, T7 · Class 1
All models of VARIAX (345)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540594150), received between Jul 30, 2018 and Mar 13, 2020 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Entrapment of Device1
- Fitting Problem1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 13, 2020Fracture; Fracture
AS REPORTED: "THE SCREW COULD NOT BE INSERTED. THE TIP MAY BE DEFORMED." DEVICE IMAGE SHOWED TIP FRACTURE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9829866 ↗MalfunctionFeb 21, 2019Fitting Problem
CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE CASE WAS ABANDONED AFTER THE PATIENT HAD BEEN ANESTHETISED BECAUSE THE APPROPRIATE TOOLS WERE NOT AVAILABLE. THE T7 BLADE DID NOT FIT INTO THE ANCHORAGE SCREWDRIVER OR OTHER HANDLES THAT WERE IN THE THEATRE. THE BLADE WAS DROPPED AND THE SURGEON NO LONGER FELT COMFORTABLE TO CONTINUE THE SURGERY WITHOUT THE CORRECT SCREWDRIVER AND THE PATIENT WAS SENT BACK TO THE WARD. ALSO, THE SCREWS PRESENT IN SURGERY WERE CROSS HEAD SCREWS AND NOT THE T7 SCREWS BECAUSE THE CUSTOMER WAS MISINFORMED OF THE PRODUCTS. THE VARIAX DISTAL RADIUS PLATE HAS BEEN REMOVED ON THE SAME DAY IN AFTERNOON UPON SECOND ATTEMPT. THE REASON FOR REMOVAL IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8359257 ↗MalfunctionJul 30, 2018Break; Entrapment of Device
DURING SURGERY THE TIP OF SCREWDRIVER BREAK OFF AND REMAIN STUCK IN THE SCREW INTERFACE. WHEN THE PLATE NEED TO BE REMOVED LATER IT WILL BE DIFFICULT DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE SCREW INTERFACE IS BLOCKED BY THE BROKEN TIP OF SCREWDRIVER.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7732847 ↗
Other Orthopedic Manual Surgical Instrument devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page