XIA 3 482318550Recalls & reported problems
Stryker Corporation · POLYAXIAL SCREW · Class 2 · Implant
All models of XIA 3 (93)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540598608), received between May 15, 2017 and Apr 14, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Mechanical Problem2
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
- Material Deformation1
- Material Separation1
- Migration1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Injury1
- Insufficient Information1
- No Code Available1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 14, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
A COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT THE TULIP OF A XIA 3 POLYAXIAL SCREW DISENGAGED INTRA-OPERATIVELY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24877426 ↗MalfunctionAug 4, 2021Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ROD INSERTION THE TULIP OF THE SCREW SPLAYED WHEN A BLOCKER WAS INSERTED INTO THE SCREW TULIP. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE BLOCKER WAS NOT CROSS THREADED. THE SCREW AND BLOCKER WERE LEFT IMPLANTED. NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES, SURGICAL DELAY OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12276025 ↗MalfunctionOct 27, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TULIP OF A XIA 3 TITANIUM POLYAXIAL SCREW AT L4 DISENGAGED LESS THAN A MONTH POST-OPERATIVELY. REVISION SURGERY IS NOT SCHEDULED AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10742591 ↗InjuryAug 28, 2019Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY TO REPLACE A XIA 3 TITANIUM POLYAXIAL SCREW WITH A DISENGAGED TULIP HEAD.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 8942147 ↗MalfunctionNov 21, 2017Loose or Intermittent Connection; Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Naturally Worn; Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; L5/S1 BY PLIF WAS PERFORMED. WHEN APPLYING COMPRESSION ON THE LEFT SIDE TEMPORARILY FIXED WITH A ROD, THE HEAD OF L5 IS COMPRESSING, THE POSITION OF THE HEAD MOVES CONSIDERABLY AND THEN WHEN TRYING TO FASTEN THE FINAL TIGHTENING WITH A TORQUE WRENCH THE LEFT SIDE OF L5 IDLES AND THE HEAD MOVES. THEREFORE, ONCE THE BLOCKER AND ROD ARE REMOVED, THE HEAD DETACHES. FOR THAT REASON, THE SCREW WAS REPLACED WITH 8.5 X 50 MM OF THE SAME SIZE, COMPRESSION WAS PERFORMED AND FINAL TIGHTENING. WHEN THE DAMAGED SCREW WAS CONFIRMED, THE WASHER BUILT IN THE HEAD WORN OUT AND WAS PARTIALLY DAMAGED. IN ADDITION, PART OF THE SIX POINTER WAS ALSO DAMAGED.
Patient problems: No Code Available; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7049716 ↗MalfunctionMay 15, 2017Detachment Of Device Component; Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT; DURING L5-S TLIF SURGERY, THE SCREW HEAD DETACHED FROM THE SCREW SHAFT WHILE THE FINAL TIGHTENING OF S1 RIGHT SCREW. THEN THE SURGEON REPLACE THE SCREW AND FINISHED THE SURGERY WITHOUT PROBLEM.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6567328 ↗
Other Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation devices
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 7540020Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation257 reports
- MANTIS Redux 48289999Stryker Corporation · Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation76 reports
- EXPEDIUM TOP NOTCH 179771555Depuy Spine, LLC · Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation41 reports
- EXPEDIUM 179712650Medos International Sàrl · Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation31 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721530Medos International Sàrl · Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation29 reports
- XIA 4 5 48130000Stryker Corporation · Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation29 reports
- XIA 4.5 System - XIA CT 48850000Stryker Corporation · Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation27 reports
- CD HORIZON® Spinal System 7576545Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Orthosis, spondylolisthesis spinal fixation26 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page