Skip to content

AVS Anchor-C 48321074Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · CERVICAL CAGE · Class 2 · Implant

All models of AVS Anchor-C (10)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540679369), received between Mar 30, 2017 and May 8, 2018 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Break1
  • Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Fracture1
  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Positioning Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 8, 2018Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Positioning Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY, AN X-RAY INDICATED THAT THE SCREW ADVANCED BEYOND THE IMPLANT. THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCT (2 SCREWS, 1 CAGE) WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A CAGE AND A PLATE. UPON REMOVAL THE CAGE CAME APART. ALL FRAGMENTS WERE RETRIEVED. THERE WAS A REPORTED 20 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY. NO REPORTS OF ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7493379 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 30, 2017Break; Fracture; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Integrity Problem; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT; SURGEON HAD DIFFICULTY REMOVING SCREWS FROM CAGE. UPDATE (B)(6) 2017 THE PLATE OF THE CAGE BROKE OFF. EVERYTHING WAS RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6445576 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page