Skip to content

TARGET XL M0036121240Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · 360 Soft Detachable Coil · Class 2 · Implant

All models of TARGET XL (34)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
17
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 17 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04546540711533), received between Dec 27, 2017 and Sep 23, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 12 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (11 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Premature Separation11
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break2
  • Expulsion1
  • Fracture1
  • Premature Activation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Thrombosis/Thrombus1

Recent adverse event reports

The 17 most recent of 17 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2026Premature Separation

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50873847 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 2, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SUBJECT COIL DETACHED INSIDE THE CATHETER. THE CATHETER AND COIL WERE REMOVED TOGETHER. BOTH DEVICES WERE REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22128625 ↗
  • InjuryJan 3, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A POSTERIOR ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA (AVF) CASE, RESISTANCE WAS FELT DURING ADVANCEMENT, AND SUBJECT COIL WAS STRETCHED AND PREMATURELY DETACHED DURING USE. ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO RETRIEVE THE REMAINING COIL; HOWEVER, IT COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AS IT WAS, AND THE PATIENT CONDITION IS NOT KNOWN.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 21074167 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE THE COIL ( SUBJECT DEVICE) PREMATURELY DETACHED WITHIN THE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN REPLACED IT WITH A NEW DEVICE AND CONTINUED THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18321163 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 14, 2023Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A NEUROVASCULAR PROCEDURE WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS DEPLOYED ABOUT FOUR OR FIVE LOOPS IN THE VESSEL, IT WAS RETRACTED TO REPOSITION. WHILE DOING SO THE SUBJECT COIL GOT PREMATURELY DETACHED AND MORE THAN 20CM OF SUBJECT COIL REMAINED IN THE MICROCATHETER. THEREFORE THE SUBJECT COIL ALONG WITH THE MICROCATHETER WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE SUBJECT COIL WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18129918 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 11, 2022Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE PROCEDURE THAT WHEN THE SUBJECT COIL WAS REPOSITIONED, IT PREMATURELY DETACHED INSIDE THE CATHETER WHILE RETRACTING. THE PHYSICIAN REPLACED BOTH DEVICES AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15581177 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 22, 2022Fracture; Expulsion; Fracture; Expulsion

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST TWO ATLAS STENT PLACEMENTS IN A Y CONFIGURATION (ONE FROM L ACA ¿ANTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY¿ TO ICA ¿INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY¿ AND ONE FROM L MCA ¿MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY¿ TO ICA ¿INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY¿), DOCTOR BEGAN COILING THE ANEURYSM THROUGH A JAILED SL-10 45 MICROCATHETER. DURING HIS FOURTH COIL DEPLOYMENT, WHEN THE DOCTOR WAS TRYING TO REPOSITION THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) IT GOT STUCK AND WOULDN¿T ADVANCE INTO THE ANEURYSM OR PULL BACK OUT OF THE ANEURYSM. THE DOCTOR ASSUMED AT THIS POINT THAT THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) FRACTURED AND BROKE. THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS PARTIALLY IN THE ANEURYSM AND PARTIALLY OUT OF THE ANEURYSM. THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS NEVER ATTEMPTED TO BE DETACHED. AT THE SAME TIME, THERE WAS THROMBUS FORMATION. USED GOOSE NECK SNARE AS MEDICAL INTERVENTION TO RETRIEVE ANY PORTION OF THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) BUT IT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. NO ONE WAS ABLE TO IDENTIFY EXACTLY WHERE THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) BREAK OCCURRED. THIRD ATLAS STENT WAS THEN PLACED PROXIMAL TO THE Y STENTS IN THE (ICA) INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY TO TACK THE COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) TAIL AGAINST THE (ICA) INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY VESSEL WALL AS MEDICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 13579050 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 7, 2021Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    ANALYSIS OF THE DEVICE REVEALED THAT THE MAIN COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED/SEPARATED DURING USE. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12595498 ↗
  • InjuryJul 20, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, PHYSICIAN WAS PLACING THE SUBJECT COIL AND WHILE REPOSITIONING, IT GOT TANGLED WITH THE COILS ALREADY PLACED IN THE ANEURYSM AND GOT STRETCHED. PHYSICIAN TRIED TO REMOVE THE WHOLE SETUP BUT THE MICROCATHETER WAS ALSO STRETCHED AND ULTIMATELY PHYSICIAN USED A SNARE DEVICE TO REMOVE THE SUBJECT COIL. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12199829 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 17, 2021Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE IN THE LEFT ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY, THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY CATHETERIZED THE ANEURYSM WITH A MICRO CATHETER. THE GUIDE WIRE WAS RETRACTED AND THE FIRST COIL WAS LOADED INTO THE MICRO CATHETER, BUT AFTER ADVANCING APPROXIMATELY ONE OR TWO THIRDS IN THE MICROCATHETER SHAFT, IT GOT STUCK IN THE MICRO CATHETER. WHEN THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO PULL BACK THE FIRST COIL, IT DETACHED IN THE MICRO CATHETER AND BOTH DEVICES WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH SIMILAR DEVICES. THE SAME EVENT HAPPENED WITH THE SECOND SUBJECT COIL AND MICRO CATHETER AND THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED AND REPLACED THEM WITH A THIRD SET OF REPLACEMENT DEVICES WHICH ALSO HAD THE SAME EVENT HAPPEN. THIS CAUSED A 30 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY. THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THEM AND REPLACED WITH SIMILAR DEVICES TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT ANY CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11832972 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 9, 2020Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    THE REVIEW OF THE INVESTIGATION OF THE RETURNED PRODUCT FOUND THE COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED DURING USE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10133683 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 5, 2019Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE SUBJECT COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED WITHIN THE (NON-STRYKER) CATHETER INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE COIL WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE PATIENTS MEDICAL CONDITION WAS GOOD. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9420615 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 9, 2019Break; Break

    REVIEW OF THE INVESTIGATION OF THE RETURNED PRODUCT REVEALED THAT THE MAIN COIL WAS BROKEN. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8497739 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 19, 2018Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUBJECT DEVICE PREMATURELY DEPLOYED INSIDE THE CATHETER. PER PHYSICIAN¿S OPINION MAY HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY FRICTION INSIDE THE CATHETER. ADDITIONALLY,THE FRICTION WAS OBSERVED WHILE ADVANCING THE SUBJECT DEVICE THROUGH STENT AND THE SUBJECT DEVICE DEPLOYED WHEN IT WAS PULLED BACK. THE SUBJECT DEVICE AND THE MICROCATHETER WERE SAFELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AS ONE UNIT AND THERE WAS NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7987197 ↗
  • InjuryOct 4, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE MAIN COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE) STRETCHED. THE STRETCHED COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT USING A GOOSE NECK SNARE. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7936754 ↗
  • InjuryApr 30, 2018Premature Activation; Premature Activation

    IT WAS REPORTED THE COIL PREMATURELY DETACHED AND THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO USE A LASSO SNARE TO RETRIEVE THE COIL FROM THE PATIENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7473537 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 27, 2017Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE WITH A COIL (SUBJECT DEVICE), THE COIL BROKE OFF INSIDE THE MICROCATHETER. THERE WAS NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7148263 ↗

Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices

All DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page