Skip to content

FUJIFILM EG-600WR v2Recalls & reported problems

Fujifilm Corporation · The device is intended for the visualization of the upper digestive tract, specifically for the observation, diagnosis, and endoscopic treatment of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04547410337402), received between Jul 24, 2018 and Dec 11, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component or Accessory Incompatibility” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Component or Accessory Incompatibility1
  • Partial Blockage1
  • Suction Failure1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 11, 2025Partial Blockage; Suction Failure; Partial Blockage; Suction Failure

    ON 11/19/2025, FUJIFILM HEALTHCARE AMERICAS CORPORTATION WAS INFORMED OF AN EVENT INVOLVING EG-600WR V2. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LOANER SCOPE WAS SENT WITH FAULTY SUCTIONING. THE CUSTOMER HAD POOR SUCTION QUALITY AND INSUFFLATION ABILITIES. THE SCOPE HAD TO BE SWITCHED OUT MID- PROCEDURE. THE PROVIDER INDICATED THIS COULD POTENTIALLY CAUSE HARM TO PATIENTS. DUE TO UNKNOWN THE PATIENT HARM, FUJIFILM HEALTHCARE AMERICAS CORPORTATION IS REPORTING THIS EVENT IN AN ABUNDANCE OF CAUTION. REF COMPLAINT NUMBER (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23784920 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 24, 2018Component or Accessory Incompatibility; Component or Accessory Incompatibility

    A MEDLINE BRUSH (NOT VALIDATED OR RECOMMENDED FOR USE WITH FUJIFILM SCOPES) WAS USED TO CLEAN A FUJIFILM GASTROSCOPE MODEL EG-600WR V2. PART OF THIS BRUSH BROKE DURING THE CLEANING PROCESS. THE CUSTOMER IS NOT CERTAIN IF THE BROKEN BRUSH PART HAD GOTTEN STUCK IN THE SCOPE OR WAS FLUSHED OUT OF THE SCOPE. NO EVIDENCE OF THE BROKEN BRUSH PART WAS FOUND AFTER SUBSEQUENT REPROCESSING CYCLES. THE SCOPE WAS USED ON OTHER PATIENTS, WITH NO REPORTS OF INFECTION. ABOUT A WEEK LATER, THE CUSTOMER INFORMED FUJIFLIM THAT THE BRUSH HAD BEEN FOUND; HOWEVER, THE CUSTOMER REFUSED TO SEND IN THE BRUSH. FUJIFILM WAS INFORMED THAT THE SPECIFIC MEDLINE BRUSH MODEL WAS CURRENTLY BEING RECALLED BY THE MANUFACTURER.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7714294 ↗

Other Gastroscope and accessories, flexible/rigid devices

All Gastroscope and accessories, flexible/rigid devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page